跳到正文

动视

争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 13 条

  1. 2026

    动视回应《使命召唤》使用梨泰院事件影像引发的批评

    公司回应

    动视确认《使命召唤:现代战争4》使用了真实新闻影像,并表示无意影射或轻视梨泰院灾难或其他现实悲剧。该公司当时尚未回应移除影像的要求。

    当事方说明的目的. Activision称使用相关画面是为了呈现游戏的虚构叙事。

    品牌回应

    • 澄清 — Activision

      However, added that it had "not intended to reference or trivialise the Itaewon disaster or any other real-world tragedy in any way, shape or form".
    • 澄清 — Activision

      The game's opening cinematic utilizes some real world news coverage to establish the game's fictional narrative,

    来源摘录

    • The company confirmed that it used the real-life footage in the game.
    • However, the BBC reported that the company has not yet responded to the demands to remove the footage from the game.
    • However, added that it had "not intended to reference or trivialise the Itaewon disaster or any other real-world tragedy in any way, shape or form".
  2. 2022

    动视就游戏作弊软件起诉 EngineOwning

    提起诉讼

    动视出版公司起诉 EngineOwning,称其分发和销售可在动视发行的游戏中作弊的软件。动视指称相关行为违法并寻求制止;这些内容属于诉讼中的指控。

    当事方说明的目的. 动视寻求制止其所称的相关行为。

    来源摘录

    • “By this lawsuit, Activision seeks to put a stop to unlawful conduct by an organization that is distributing and selling for profit numerous malicious software products designed to enable members of the public to gain unfair competitive advantages (i.e., to cheat) in the COD Games,” Activision said.
    • Activision Publishing, a subsidiary of Activision Blizzard, filed a lawsuit Tuesday against EngineOwning, a company that advertises cheats for Call of Duty games and other popular online shooters, and is seeking to shut down software that allows people to cheat in any Activision-published game.
  3. 2021

    涉及动视暴雪的工作场所歧视和骚扰指控

    加利福尼亚州的民权机构提起诉讼,指控动视暴雪存在歧视、骚扰和不平等待遇。随后的监管和就业相关程序也涉及工作场所行为和企业文化。这些指控涉及母公司及其工作场所,而非特定动视游戏。

  4. 2021

    陪审团在 Booker T 诉动视案中裁定支持动视

    裁决

    在 Booker T 提起的诉讼中,陪审团裁定支持动视。Booker T 指控动视以其 G.I. Bro 角色为《使命召唤:黑色行动 4》中的角色 Prophet 提供灵感。陪审团的裁定使该案以动视胜诉告终。现有信息未包含有关诉讼程序、双方论点或所寻求任何救济的进一步细节。

    在 Booker T 指控 Activision 以其 G.I. Bro 角色为《使命召唤:黑色行动 4》中的 Prophet 提供灵感的诉讼中,陪审团裁定支持 Activision。

    来源摘录

    • Sportico reports that the WWE Hall of Famer’s lawsuit over the character ended with the jury finding in Activision’s favor.
    • Booker sued Activision in February of 2019, alleging that the company ripped off the comic book version of his G.I. Bro character as the inspiration for Prophet.
  5. 2021

    动视暴雪反驳报道并介绍职场措施

    公司回应

    2021年11月,动视暴雪对《华尔街日报》的一篇报道作出回应,称该报道对公司及Bobby Kotick作出了不准确且具有误导性的描述。公司表示,对提交给Kotick的性不端行为问题采取了行动,并提到针对不当行为的零容忍政策。该声明是动视暴雪对该报道公开回应的一部分,其中公司对报道的描述提出异议,并介绍了其职场措施。

    动视暴雪称《华尔街日报》的报道对公司及Bobby Kotick作出了不准确且具有误导性的描述。公司表示,对提交给Kotick的性不端行为问题采取了行动,并提到针对不当行为的零容忍政策。

    品牌回应

    • 否认 — Activision

      In a public statement, Activision said the Journal’s report “presents an inaccurate and misleading view” of the company and Kotick.

    来源摘录

    • In a public statement, Activision said the Journal’s report “presents an inaccurate and misleading view” of the company and Kotick. “Instances of sexual misconduct that were brought to his attention were acted upon.” Activision said the report “ignores important changes” underway at the company, including a zero-tolerance policy for inappropriate conduct.
  6. 2021

    动视就《使命召唤:先锋》内容致歉并将其移除

    公司回应

    动视就其称对穆斯林社群不敏感的内容致歉,并表示已将该内容从《使命召唤:先锋》中移除。公司称正在采取内部措施以防止类似情况再次发生。该事件于2021年11月11日被报道。

    当事方说明的目的. 防止此类情况再次发生

    品牌回应

    • 道歉 — Activision

      We deeply apologize.
    • 整改 — Activision

      there was insensitive content to the Muslim community mistakenly included last week, and has since been removed from the game.
    • 调查 — Activision

      We are taking immediate steps internally to address the situation to prevent such occurrences in the future.

    来源摘录

    • “We deeply apologize. We are taking immediate steps internally to address the situation to prevent such occurrences in the future.”
    • Activision didn’t describe the pages in its apology but did acknowledge “there was insensitive content to the Muslim community mistakenly included last week, and has since been removed from the game.”
  7. 2021

    示威者抗议Activision Blizzard对骚扰诉讼的回应

    公众反弹

    逾百人在南加州的一处Activision Blizzard办公室外示威,声援一宗性骚扰诉讼并抗议公司的回应。粉丝也试图组织抵制Activision游戏,以声援员工。

    来源摘录

    • Last week, California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing sued Activision, detailing accusations of sexual harassment and assault, as well as a culture in which women faced unequal pay and retaliation.
    • Elsewhere online, fans sought to organize a boycott of Activision games in solidarity with employees.
    • More than 100 people showed up Wednesday morning outside an office of Activision Blizzard Inc. in Southern California to demonstrate their support of a sexual harassment lawsuit and to protest the video game maker’s insufficient response.
  8. 2021

    Activision 就 Warzone 商标争议提起诉讼

    提起诉讼

    Activision 就「Warzone」名称的使用及商标权,对 Warzone.com 提交正式诉状,并表示寻求法院判定双方权利。Activision Blizzard 发言人否认侵权,并称对方主张毫无根据。

    品牌回应

    • 否认 — Activision Blizzard

      We do not infringe his intellectual property.

    来源摘录

    • Activision filed a formal complaint against the indie developer behind the browser-based strategy game Warzone. The complaint is over the usage and trademark rights for the “Warzone” title, which the two companies have been in dispute about for the last several months.
    • We do not infringe his intellectual property.
  9. 2021

    动视就商标使用起诉 Warzone.com

    提起诉讼

    动视出版公司就“Warzone”和“Call of Duty Warzone”标志的使用起诉 Warzone.com LLC。动视请求法院判定其使用未侵犯 Warzone.com 所称的商标权等事项。

    来源摘录

    • In its complaint, Activision seeks a judgment declaring that, among other things, (1) Warzone.com does not possess exclusive trademark rights to the term “Warzone”; (2) Activision use of “Warzone” or “Call of Duty Warzone” marks do not infringe and has not infringed on Warzone.com’s alleged trademark;
    • On April 8, 2021, Activision Publishing, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Warzone.com LLC regarding the use of the word marks “Warzone” and “Call of Duty Warzone.”
  10. 2021

    Activision因被指角色版权侵权遭起诉

    提起诉讼

    摄影师Haugen提起诉讼,指称Activision在创作Mara角色时抄袭了其Cade Janus角色及照片的元素。文章报道的是指控,并未认定侵权成立。

    来源摘录

    • The suit goes on to claim that Activision then hired Zedra and requested that she acquire the same clothing and gear used in the Janus photo series.
    • Activision is the latest massive company being hit with accusations of a stolen character. A recently filed lawsuit alleges that
    • So far, Activision has not commented on the matter.
  11. 2020

    法院驳回AM General针对动视的悍马诉讼

    裁决

    美国联邦地区法院驳回了AM General针对动视在《使命召唤》中使用悍马车辆提起的诉讼。法院裁定,该游戏对车辆的使用未侵犯AM General的权利。该裁决使悍马车辆得以继续出现在游戏中。该事件于2020年4月3日被报道。

    来源摘录

    • According to a report by Motor Trend, AM General filed a lawsuit against the creator of Call of Duty because the game had been prominently displaying the Humvee without their permission.
    • The conflict between the two companies has now ended as Activision recently won the lawsuit by American Motors General Corporation against them.
    • The suit was dismissed in favor of Activision since there was no infringement done by the company by featuring Humvees.
  12. 2020

    法院驳回AM General对Activision提起的诉讼

    裁决

    一名联邦法官驳回了AM General针对Activision提起的诉讼,该案涉及《使命召唤》系列游戏中对悍马车辆的描绘。法院认同车辆的出现有助于游戏的艺术写实效果这一观点。该裁决结束了这起围绕游戏中车辆设计使用的法律挑战。

    来源摘录

    • In 2017, Activision was sued by AM General over . In its defense, the publisher said the vehicle’s inclusion was a “first amendment” issue, a point a federal judge agreed with today while dismissing GM’s case.Call of Duty’s accurate depiction of Humvees
  13. 2020

    动视就前首席财务官的任命起诉 Netflix

    提起诉讼

    动视就 Netflix 任命其前首席财务官斯宾塞·诺伊曼一事对 Netflix 提起诉讼。据报道,诉讼指称 Netflix 故意干涉合同、不正当竞争,并协助和教唆违反信托义务。该事件于 2020 年 12 月 6 日被报道。

    来源摘录

    • The suit alleges Netflix poached Neumann after he served just 18 months at the gaming giant and, according to Hollywood Reporter, is suing for "intentional interference with contract, unfair competition, and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty".