争议事件
以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。
返回词条共 6 条
2022
Arizona Beverages因Arnold Palmer Lite标签遭起诉
提起诉讼
Kenneth Crawford对Arizona Beverages USA LLC提起诉讼,指称Arnold Palmer Lite因含糖量及标注其为美国产品的图案而存在误导性标签。诉状寻求禁令救济和金钱赔偿;这些内容属于指控,并非裁定。
来源摘录
The complaint also alleges that the “An American Company—Family Owned and Operated” graphic on the Arnold Palmer Lite beverage is a misrepresentation because the product is a Product of Canada.
The complaint briefly explains that as more and more consumers are becoming health conscious, companies are following this trend. And that the use of the term “Lite” is misleading health-conscious consumers.
2021
卡夫亨氏因可能含有金属或玻璃召回粉末饮料产品
宣布召回
卡夫亨氏公司在美国自愿召回 Country Time Lemonade、Tang、Arizona Tea 和 Kool-Aid 品牌的粉末饮料产品,原因是产品可能含有生产过程中引入的极小金属或玻璃碎片。受影响产品的“最佳食用日期”为2023年5月10日至2023年11月1日。
品牌回应
整改 — The Kraft Heinz Company
Kraft Heinz said it is actively working with retail partners and distributors to remove said products from circulation
退款或补偿 — Kraft Heinz
Consumers can also contact Kraft Heinz to receive reimbursement.
来源摘录
The powdered beverage products involved are those with “Best When Used By” dates between May 10, 2023, and November 1, 2023.
voluntarily recalled Country Time Lemonade, Tang, Arizona Tea, and Kool-Aid powdered beverage products in the US due to the potential presence of very small pieces of metal or glass that may have been introduced during production.
2020
消费者就饮料中疑似有啮齿动物起诉Arizona Tea
提起诉讼
一名佛蒙特州男子起诉Arizona Tea,称他在一罐茶饮中发现啮齿动物尾巴,饮用后遭受身体及其他创伤。来源报道的是诉讼中的指控,并未报告法院裁定。
来源摘录
A man from Vermont bought a 99¢ can of Arizona Tea and took a big drink when he found something much worse than he bargained for, and now he's suing (justifiably so).
“After feeling the rodent’s tail in his mouth and seeing what it was, plaintiff Rudy Gallo became sick and began vomiting,” says the lawsuit filed recently in federal court in Vermont.
2010
Ferolito与Vultaggio所有权诉讼
联合创始人John Ferolito就AriZona业务的所有权、估值及未来走向提起诉讼。该纠纷持续数年,最终以Vultaggio取得公司完全控制权告终。
1992
Crazy Horse麦芽酒命名争议
一款使用“Crazy Horse”名称的麦芽酒产品,招致受人尊敬的拉科塔族领袖Tasunke Witko(即“Crazy Horse”)的代表及后裔采取法律行动。原告主张,以其名字推销酒精饮品具有冒犯性,并侵犯了形象权及相关权利。
1980
Midnight Dragon广告争议
在创办AriZona茶饮业务之前,创始人曾以带有性暗示和挑逗性的广告推销Midnight Dragon麦芽酒。该广告活动引发公众批评,成为两位合伙人早期酒类业务争议史的一部分。