Controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile3 entries
2019
Supreme Court denies Domino’s appeal in website accessibility case
Ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court denied Domino’s petition challenging a lower-court ruling in Guillermo Robles’s lawsuit alleging that the pizza chain’s website and app were inaccessible to blind users, leaving that ruling in place.
Company response
Clarification — Domino's Pizza
Domino's issued a statement expressing its disappointment over the Supreme Court's decision and said that it looks forward to presenting the case at trial court.
Source excerpt
Domino's issued a statement expressing its disappointment over the Supreme Court's decision and said that it looks forward to presenting the case at trial court.
The case was started by a blind man named Guillermo Robles, who sued Domino's after being unable to order pizzas from the company's website and mobile app despite using screen-reading software.
Domino's appealed against this ruling with the Supreme Court, which denied the petition on Monday and left the lower court's decision in standing.
2007
Allegations concerning franchise-worker treatment
A Newsnight report alleged that some Domino's workers experienced deductions related to delivery-car insurance and that one employee's first-week wages were treated as unpaid training. Chief executive Stephen Hemsley disputed the claim that such practices were systemic throughout the franchise network.
Use of zero-hour contracts
The United Kingdom Domino's franchise network has made extensive use of zero-hour contracts, an employment practice that has attracted broader public and political debate.