Skip to content
Brand AI

FESCO Adecco

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile1 entries

  1. 2014

    FESCO Adecco repeatedly ordered to pay compensation for unlawful labor contract termination

    The Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court judgment (2014) Hu Er Zhong Min San (Min) Zhong Zi No. 92 found that Beijing FESCO Adecco Human Resources Service Shanghai Co., Ltd. had insufficient evidence for terminating the labor relationship and had to pay compensation for unlawful termination of the labor contract. Other reports said its Shenzhen branch was ordered to pay compensation and wage differentials for unlawful termination; Qichacha shows that its Shanghai company is involved in hundreds of judicial cases, and human resources and social security departments in Guangzhou, Qingdao and other places also issued labor dispute arbitration notices involving FESCO Adecco. Progress: court judgment. Entity involved: Beijing FESCO Adecco Human Resources Service Shanghai Co., Ltd. Scope: FESCO Adecco dispatched and outsourced employees.

    Source