跳到正文

Flock Safety

争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 3 条

  1. 2026

    芝加哥郊区高校要求Flock Safety移除摄像头以保护移民学生,公司拒绝

    问题披露

    Flock Safety 卷入一场争议:芝加哥郊区一所高校要求该公司移除其摄像头,理由是保护移民学生。据《芝加哥太阳时报》报道,Flock Safety 拒绝移除摄像头。争议焦点在于该高校对移民学生的关切以及公司拒绝遵从移除要求。

    当事方说明的目的. 禁止联邦机构使用自动车牌识别器(ALPR),或调取地方警方及私营公司运行的识别器所收集的数据。

    品牌回应

    • 澄清 — Flock Safety

      company says it was an error
    • 否认 — Flock Safety

      Flock stands by the accuracy and integrity of its technology and intends to vigorously defend itself in this litigation
    • 整改 — Flock Safety

      Flock also said it would reduce the default setting for how long license-plate data is stored, from 30 days to seven, and give police departments more control over how their data is shared with other agencies.
    • 否认 — Flock Safety

    来源摘录

    • To protect immigrant students, a Chicago-area college told Flock to remove its cameras. The company refused.
    • Flock Safety, whose cameras scan license plates across the country, continues to draw public anger, and now Senator Bernie Sanders wants the federal government out of the business altogether.
    • Despite its title, the bill doesn’t call out nine-year-old Flock in the text but rather covers any and all ALPR systems.
  2. 2026

    Flock Safety 在与洛厄尔(Lowell)的争议中为其监控产品辩护

    公司回应

    监控公司 Flock Safety 在被表述为“Flock vs. Lowell”的冲突中公开为其产品辩护。现有来源仅为新闻标题,未说明争议的具体指控或细节。来源未提供有关当事方、主张或结果的进一步信息。

    来源摘录

    • Flock vs. Lowell: Surveillance company defends product
  3. 2026

    Flock Safety 因合同取消及摄像头拆除问题面临争议

    问题披露

    报道提及 Flock Safety 客户在终止服务和拆除摄像头方面遇到争议。普利茅斯官员称,等待拆除安排期间摄像头仍留在原处;代顿官员称,该市暂停项目后有两台摄像头未经授权重新投入使用。Flock 表示正与客户协调拆除设备。

    品牌回应

    • 澄清 — Flock Safety

      Flock Safety has responded to the disputes by saying it respects local governments' decisions to discontinue its services and is coordinating with affected customers to remove its equipment.
    • 整改 — Flock

      We respect the city’s decision and are working with the customer to have the cameras removed.

    来源摘录

    • However, the city later discovered that two cameras had been placed back into service without authorization.
    • Flock Safety has responded to the disputes by saying it respects local governments' decisions to discontinue its services and is coordinating with affected customers to remove its equipment.
    • Flock Safety is facing mounting scrutiny after several local governments reported difficulties terminating their contracts and getting the company's surveillance cameras removed.