Skip to content

Goodix

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile3 entries

  1. 2021

    WaveTouch patent-infringement litigation

    WaveTouch, a British technology company, filed a lawsuit alleging that Goodix copied a system intended to improve the accuracy of fingerprint readers positioned beneath smartphone screens. The available reference does not state the final judicial or settlement outcome.

  2. 2020

    CNIPA invalidates Goodix patent asserted against Egis Technology

    Ruling

    Egis Technology reported that China's National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) declared Goodix patent ZL201820937410.2 invalid. According to the report, the patent had been asserted in infringement litigation against Egis that was pending before the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. The report identifies the patent number and the court where the litigation was pending, and states that CNIPA issued the invalidation decision. No further details on the grounds for the decision or its effect on the litigation were provided in the source.

    Egis Technology reported that China's CNIPA declared Goodix patent ZL201820937410.2 invalid. The patent had been asserted in infringement litigation against Egis pending before the Beijing Intellectual Property Court.

    Source excerpt

    • As such, the patent asserted in patent infringement litigation against Egis, pending with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, is invalidated.
    • Egis Technology Inc. (6462:TWO) today receives patent invalidation decision from China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) wherein Goodix's patent ZL201820937410.2 was declared invalid.
  3. 2019

    Court dismisses Silead's patent infringement claim against Goodix

    Ruling

    The Shanghai Intellectual Property Court dismissed Silead's patent infringement claim against Goodix on October 16, 2019. The article states that the patent asserted in the case had been declared entirely invalid by the patent review authority on August 8, 2019.

    Source excerpt

    • 鉴于原告上海思立微电子科技有限公司在本案中要求保护的上述发明专利权被国家知识产权局专利局复审和无效审理部审查宣告全部无效,裁定如下:驳回原告上海思立微电子科技有限公司的起诉。
    • 2019 年 10 月 16 日,上海知识产权法院驳回了上海思立微电子科技有限公司的起诉,本诉讼案件已告终结。
    • 上海思立微电子科技有限公司诉公司侵害发明专利权纠纷案件