Skip to content

Nestlé Purina PetCare

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile4 entries

  1. 2024

    Denver facility odor litigation

    Residents near Purina’s Denver pet-food plant filed litigation alleging persistent odors, nuisance and impacts on quality of life. Purina disputed the allegations and maintained that its environmental controls met or exceeded relevant standards. The case generated local criticism and continued legal attention.

  2. 2022

    Purina Pro Plan Veterinary Diets EL Elemental recall

    The company voluntarily recalled selected lots of Pro Plan Veterinary Diets EL Elemental dry dog food in the United States because of potentially elevated vitamin D. The FDA notice treated the action as a product-safety recall affecting specific lots rather than the entire Pro Plan portfolio.

  3. 2020

    Purina Animal Nutrition recalls four feed products

    Recall announced

    Purina Animal Nutrition issued a recall of four feed products after customer complaints that animals were falling ill. The company said it found elevated calcium levels in the food, which could cause severe health issues and, in some cases, death.

    Company response

    • Refund or compensation — Impacted customers

      Impacted customers should discard the food or return it to a local feed store for a refund.

    Source excerpt

    • Pet company Purina Animal Nutrition has issued a massive recall across several of its food brands.
    • Impacted customers should discard the food or return it to a local feed store for a refund.
  4. 2015

    Beneful product-quality class-action litigation

    A class-action lawsuit filed in California alleged that Beneful dog food contained substances that could poison or kill dogs. Nestlé Purina denied the allegations, and the claims became a prominent public controversy around product ingredients and safety. The episode generated extensive media and consumer discussion but did not establish that Beneful generally caused the alleged harms.