Controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile2 entries
2025
Controversy Over Forced Pay Cuts, Suspended Salaries, and Unpaid Wages
In October 2025, multiple employees in PEAK's direct-operated system said the company required pay cuts, and those who refused to accept them or did not write a self-criticism had their wages suspended; reports said PEAK's direct-operated business had lost more than 100 million yuan. Quanzhou's local human resources and social security department said it had noticed the matter and opened a case. In June 2026, another account exposed that PEAK owed 500,000 yuan in modern pentathlon sponsorship fees and one year of employee wage arrears; Chairman Xu Jingnan denied signing the contract and said a police report had been made, and related videos were taken down. As of October 2026, the Quanzhou Labor and Personnel Dispute Arbitration Commission still had PEAK-related economic compensation cases under review.
2020
PEAK Quick-Dry Basketball Set Performs Poorly on Multiple Metrics in Comparative Test
In a Beijing Consumers Association comparative test of moisture-wicking quick-dry clothing, the PEAK DF793061 basketball short set showed problems with drip diffusion time, water absorption rate, and wicking height, while its webpage claimed quick-dry and moisture-wicking properties. The scope covers this sample and the correspondence with its promotional claims. Progress: the consumer organization's comparative test was reported by the media. Subject: PEAK brand-related product.