Skip to content

Transnet

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile6 entries

  1. 2024

    Investigation into alleged maladministration over executive reinstatement

    The Special Investigating Unit was authorised to examine allegations concerning the reinstatement of Siyabonga Gama as Transnet Freight Rail chief executive in 2011.

  2. 2022

    Criminal case involving former executives

    Former chief executive Siyabonga Gama and four other executives were arrested on allegations of corruption, fraud and money laundering and were released on bail.

  3. 2021

    DA alleges Transnet cyberattack was sabotage

    Issue disclosure

    The Democratic Alliance alleged that a cyberattack on Transnet's IT infrastructure was an act of sabotage potentially carried out by people behind the failed insurrection. The article presents this as an allegation, not a determination.

    Source excerpt

    • By connecting the dots of the past week's failed insurrection, it is becoming increasingly clear that the crippling cyberattack on Transnet's IT infrastructure was an act of sabotage potentially carried out by the perpetrators of the insurrection.
    • 28th July 2021
  4. 2020

    Dismissal of executives linked to state-capture allegations

    Three senior executives were reported as dismissed after being implicated in alleged conduct connected with state capture and procurement controversies.

  5. 2017

    Locomotive procurement and alleged state capture

    Forensic findings alleged that former executives misled the Transnet board and contributed to an increase in the locomotive programme's cost from approximately R50 billion to at least R54 billion. The allegations formed part of wider investigations into state capture and irregular procurement.

  6. Pension-fund civil claim

    Approximately 66,000 pensioners brought a civil claim alleging that Transnet pension funds were stripped of assets or mismanaged and that pension increases were insufficient. The reference material reports a claimed value of approximately US$6.5 billion, but the litigation outcome is not established here.