Skip to content

Product brand

Unclaimed

A Polish-language weekly review published in Warsaw from 1886 to 1905, combining literary, social, political, and scientific writing.

Last updated November 4, 2026

AI crawler reads

No AI crawler has read this profile yet.

Overview

Głos was a Polish-language weekly review issued in Warsaw between 1886 and 1905. Its title means “The Voice.” The periodical became one of the most visible publications associated with Polish positivism and later served as an important forum for the emerging National Democratic movement. Although formally published within the Russian Empire and subject to imperial censorship, it was connected clandestinely with the National League, an underground Polish political organization led by Roman Dmowski and active across the territories of the former Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. The journal began publication in October 1886 under an official description emphasizing scientific, literary, social, and political content. Its initial orientation was distinctly left-leaning and positivist. It promoted the idea of social reconstruction through education, the development of a modern civic culture, and the gradual formation of a “new society.” Its early editorial program addressed mass education, the emancipation of socially disadvantaged groups, and the position and assimilation of Polish Jews. The review’s political direction shifted toward the right by approximately 1888 as its links with the National League became more influential, although it retained elements of the positivist language and social concerns that had shaped its founding period. Głos was aimed primarily at the intelligentsia, but its extensive literary content broadened its readership. Novels, short stories, poetry, reportage, editorials, and feuilletons appeared regularly. The periodical printed work by major Polish writers and poets, including Adolf Dygasiński, Jan Kasprowicz, Bolesław Leśmian, Maria Konopnicka, Władysław Orkan, Eliza Orzeszkowa, Wacław Sieroszewski, Stanisław Przybyszewski, and Leopold Staff. It also published translations of contemporary foreign literature. Janusz Korczak contributed editorials, reportage, and feuilletons, and one of his novels appeared in the publication in 1904 and 1905. Through this combination of political commentary and literary publication, Głos became a significant channel for naturalist writing and for debates about Polish national and social development. The journal’s political identity was complicated and changed over time. In its first years, it presented itself as a reformist and positivist review. From 1889 onward, however, it increasingly published antisemitic material, and by 1891 it had helped formulate an anti-Jewish political program later associated with National Democracy. This development generated a lasting historical controversy. Some contributors, including Józef Potocki, advocated cooperation and friendship with Polish Jews and attempted to distinguish Głos from the more openly antisemitic publication Rola. Nevertheless, the periodical’s later editorial line gave ideological antisemitism a prominent place and helped normalize it for sections of the Polish intelligentsia. Głos effectively ceased publication in 1894 after much of its staff, including acting editor-in-chief Jan Ludwik Popławski, was arrested for participation in an illegal commemoration of the centenary of the Kościuszko Uprising. Most of those arrested were released in the following year, but the authorities prevented them from resuming publication of the newspaper. The title was subsequently reorganized under Zygmunt Wasilewski. In this second phase, it continued to support the National League’s aspiration to Polish statehood while adopting a comparatively more left-oriented social stance. In 1901, Jan Władysław Dawid bought the title and led the review during the final period of its existence. Under Dawid, Głos criticized the bourgeoisie, landed gentry, and other privileged groups more openly. The review continued to combine cultural journalism with political and social commentary, but the revolutionary conditions of 1905 brought it into direct conflict with the Russian authorities. During the Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland, the imperial administration closed Głos in December 1905. It did not resume publication as the same 1886–1905 periodical.

History

Głos was founded in Warsaw in 1886 as a Polish-language weekly review devoted to science, literature, society, and politics. Its initial program reflected Polish positivism: rather than relying exclusively on armed insurrection, it emphasized education, social development, civic modernization, and the gradual construction of a capable national community under partition. The publication was officially tolerated by Russian imperial censorship, but it was also clandestinely connected to the National League, an underground organization active in the three partitioned territories and led by Roman Dmowski. The review’s readership was centered on the intelligentsia, yet its literary material gave it broader reach. Regular publication of fiction, poetry, translations, reportage, editorials, and feuilletons helped make it both a political forum and a literary platform. Major contributors included Adolf Dygasiński, Jan Kasprowicz, Bolesław Leśmian, Maria Konopnicka, Władysław Orkan, Eliza Orzeszkowa, Wacław Sieroszewski, Stanisław Przybyszewski, and Leopold Staff. Janusz Korczak also wrote editorials, reportage, and feuilletons for the periodical and had a novel published in its final years. Głos was particularly important as a venue for naturalist literary currents in late nineteenth-century Poland. Its political position changed during the first decade. The publication was clearly left-leaning and pro-positivist at launch, but by 1888 it had moved toward the right under the influence of the National League. It maintained a language of social improvement while increasingly linking social questions to national organization and Polish statehood. Topics included the education of the masses, the emancipation of lower social groups, the assimilation of Polish Jews, and the relationship between the intelligentsia and the broader population. The journal’s record on antisemitism became one of its most consequential and controversial features. In the inaugural year, co-founder Jan Ludwik Popławski discussed assimilation of Polish Jews while expressing doubts about its feasibility on religious and anthropological grounds. According to later historical analysis, this represented an early racialized formulation in the Polish press. Józef Potocki, another Głos editor, advocated friendship with Polish Jews and sought to resist the influence of the more openly antisemitic Rola. Nevertheless, from 1889 the publication’s treatment of Jewish issues became more frequent and hostile. By 1891 it had outlined an anti-Jewish program that contributed to the ideological development of National Democracy. Unlike Rola, which was associated with more personal and economically framed attacks, Głos often presented antisemitism in a more political and ideological register. This did not make the position less discriminatory; rather, it gave exclusionary ideas a more respectable intellectual presentation for parts of the radical intelligentsia. The first phase of Głos ended in 1894. Many staff members, including acting editor-in-chief Jan Ludwik Popławski, were arrested for participating in an unauthorized commemoration of the centenary of the Kościuszko Uprising. Although most were released the following year, the Russian authorities prevented them from continuing to publish the newspaper. The title was then reformed under Zygmunt Wasilewski. During this second phase, Głos continued to support the National League’s long-term goal of Polish statehood but moved toward a comparatively more leftist social position. Jan Władysław Dawid purchased the title in 1901 and directed its final period. Dawid’s Głos criticized the bourgeoisie, landed gentry, and other privileged groups, giving the review a sharper social-critical profile while preserving its interest in political and national questions. The publication remained active through the revolutionary upheavals of 1905. In December of that year, Russian authorities closed it during the Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland. The closure ended the historical run covered by the article Głos (1886–1905).

  • 1905

    Publication suppressed

    [1]

    Russian authorities close Głos in December during the Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland.

  • 1901

    Jan Władysław Dawid becomes owner

    [1]

    Jan Władysław Dawid purchases the title and guides its final editorial period.

  • 1895

    Reorganized under Zygmunt Wasilewski

    [1]

    The title is revived in a reorganized form under Zygmunt Wasilewski, retaining its national-state orientation while taking a more leftist social line.

  • 1894

    First publication phase ends after arrests

    [1]

    Arrests connected with an illegal Kościuszko Uprising commemoration remove much of the staff and effectively interrupt publication.

  • 1891

    Anti-Jewish program takes shape

    [1]

    Głos has developed an ideological anti-Jewish program that later influences the political language of National Democracy.

  • 1888

    Political realignment

    [1]

    The review moves from its initial left-leaning positivist orientation toward the political right and becomes more closely associated with the National League.

  • 1886

    First issue appears

    [1]

    Głos begins publication in Warsaw in October as a Polish-language weekly review covering scientific, literary, social, and political subjects.

Products and positioning

An influential Polish-language intellectual weekly positioned at the intersection of literary culture, social reform, political journalism, and debates about Polish national development. Its editorial stance moved from left-leaning positivism toward National Democratic politics, before becoming more socially critical under Jan Władysław Dawid.

  • Periodical · 1886

    Głos weekly review

    The core publication was a weekly Polish-language review issued in Warsaw. Each issue combined political editorials and social commentary with scientific writing, literary fiction, poetry, reportage, feuilletons, and translations. Its literary section helped the periodical reach beyond the intelligentsia and made it a notable platform for Polish naturalist writing and for serial or otherwise periodic publication by leading authors of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Controversies

  • 1889

    Antisemitic editorial turn

    From 1889, Głos increasingly published hostile material about Jews. By 1891 it had articulated an ideological anti-Jewish program, making the periodical an important historical example in the development and legitimation of antisemitism within sections of the Polish political intelligentsia.

Read more

Brand decisions

  • 1905

    Closure by Russian authoritiesOther

    Background

    The Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland intensified state scrutiny of political publications.

    Action taken

    Russian authorities closed Głos in December 1905.

    Aftermath

    The closure ended the publication’s existence as the 1886–1905 Warsaw weekly.

  • 1901

    Dawid acquires the publicationM&A

    Background

    Following its reorganization, the review entered a new editorial phase under National League-associated leadership.

    Action taken

    Jan Władysław Dawid bought the title and assumed leadership of the publication.

    Aftermath

    Under Dawid, Głos adopted a more explicit critique of the bourgeoisie, gentry, and other privileged groups before its final suppression in 1905.

  • 1895

    Reform and relaunch after the 1894 disruptionStrategy

    Background

    Arrests following an unauthorized Kościuszko Uprising commemoration had removed much of the original staff and prevented an immediate continuation of the newspaper.

    Action taken

    The title was reorganized under Zygmunt Wasilewski and returned with a somewhat more leftist social orientation.

    Aftermath

    The revived review continued to support Polish statehood while broadening its criticism of social and economic privilege.

  • 1888

    Shift toward National League politicsStrategy

    Background

    The review began as a left-leaning positivist publication but operated in an environment shaped by underground Polish political organization and imperial censorship.

    Action taken

    Its editorial direction moved toward the right and became more closely aligned with the National League while retaining some positivist social language.

    Aftermath

    Głos became an influential forum for ideas that contributed to the formation of National Democratic politics.

Sources1 sources

Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/głos · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled