Skip to content

Gatton family

Request correction

Corporate brand

Unclaimed

The Gatton, or de Gatton, family was an Anglo-Norman land-owning dynasty associated with Gatton in Surrey and estates in south-eastern England.

Last updated August 26, 2026

AI crawler reads

No AI crawler has read this profile yet.

Overview

The Gatton family, also styled de Gatton, was an Anglo-Norman landed dynasty whose name derived from the lordship of Gatton in Surrey. The family is recorded as holding substantial property in south-eastern England, particularly across Surrey, Kent, and Sussex, during the eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries. Its historical significance lies in the relationship between medieval landholding, feudal service, local administration, and the inheritance of manors rather than in any modern commercial activity. The lineage is traditionally traced in the available references to Hemfrid de Gatton, followed by members including Hamo de Gatton and Robert de Gatton. The family name was locational: it identified a connection with the Gatton lordship and its associated estates. As with many medieval dynasties, the family’s influence was expressed through possession of manors, knight service, royal tenure, and participation in county administration. The surviving account does not establish a single formal founding date, and the family should therefore be understood as a medieval lineage rather than an organization created at a precisely documented moment. Among the recorded members was Robert de Gatton, who held the manor of Thrule during the reign of Henry III. A later historical account by Edward Hasted states that Robert held the manor by knight service of the king, through the honour of Peverel after that honour had escheated to the Crown. Robert was succeeded by his eldest son, Hamo de Gatton. The younger Hamo was associated with the manor and served as sheriff in the fourteenth year of Edward I, demonstrating the family’s participation in local government as well as its landed position. The succession later became more complex. Hamo’s eldest son, also named Hamo, left a son named Edmund, who was an infant at the time of his inheritance. Edmund subsequently died under age. His two sisters became coheirs and divided the family’s inheritance through their marriages. Elizabeth’s share passed to her husband William de Dene and included the manor of Thrule and the family’s other Kentish estates. Margery’s share passed to her husband Simon de Norwood and included Gatton and the remaining Surrey properties. This division illustrates how medieval inheritance and marriage could redistribute a family’s landed power across different households. The Gatton family is documented in later antiquarian and genealogical works, including Edward Hasted’s 1798 survey of Kent and an 1863 article in Archaeologia Cantiana concerning charters of Cumbwell Priory and a pedigree of the family. The available material does not provide evidence of a continuing commercial brand, contemporary corporate structure, current leadership, or active business operations. Accordingly, the Gatton family is best catalogued as a historical dynastic name represented in reference literature, with its principal legacy consisting of medieval landholding, feudal obligations, local office, and the subsequent dispersal of its estates through coheiress succession.

History

The Gatton or de Gatton family was an Anglo-Norman land-owning lineage named after Gatton in Surrey. The family held important estates in south-eastern England, with particular associations in Surrey, Kent, and Sussex, during the eleventh through thirteenth centuries. The surviving historical description presents the family through its manorial possessions and genealogical succession rather than through a centralized institution or a modern corporate identity. The recorded lineage begins with Hemfrid de Gatton and includes Hamo de Gatton and Robert de Gatton. The use of the name de Gatton reflects the medieval practice of identifying landholders through their principal place or lordship. Such a designation could signify possession, tenure, or a strong hereditary association with an estate. The family’s position depended on the wider feudal system, in which landholding was connected with obligations to the Crown and with service to a superior lord. Robert de Gatton is described in Edward Hasted’s late eighteenth-century history of Kent as holding the manor of Thrule during the reign of Henry III. His tenure was held by knight service of the king and was connected with the honour of Peverel following that honour’s escheat. Robert was succeeded by his eldest son, Hamo de Gatton, who resided at Thrule and served as sheriff in the fourteenth year of Edward I. This office indicates that the family’s role extended beyond private ownership into county administration and the exercise of royal authority locally. The next succession recorded in the reference material involved another Hamo de Gatton and his son Edmund. Edmund was an infant when his inheritance came to him and later died under age. His two sisters consequently became coheirs. Through their marriages, the family’s lands were divided between William de Dene and Simon de Norwood. Elizabeth, wife of William de Dene, received Thrule and the remaining Gatton estates in Kent, while Margery, wife of Simon de Norwood, received Gatton and the other estates in Surrey. This inheritance pattern marks the dispersal of the dynasty’s territorial base and helps explain why the family’s holdings were subsequently associated with other surnames. Later genealogical and antiquarian scholarship preserved the family’s history. Hasted’s 1798 History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent discusses the family’s ownership and succession, while an 1863 contribution to Archaeologia Cantiana reproduces material concerning Cumbwell Priory charters and a pedigree of the Gatton family. These sources are valuable for reconstructing the family’s place in medieval landholding, but the available material does not establish a modern continuation, current organization, or commercial enterprise operating under the name. The Gatton family is therefore treated here as a historical lineage rather than as an active brand.

  • 1863

    Genealogical material published in Archaeologia Cantiana

    [1]

    An Archaeologia Cantiana article presented charters of Cumbwell Priory together with a pedigree of the Gatton family.

  • 1798

    Family holdings discussed by Edward Hasted

    [1]

    Edward Hasted’s survey of Kent described the family’s connection with Thrule, Gatton, and associated estates and recorded the later inheritance division.

  • Hemfrid de Gatton recorded in the family lineage

    [1]

    Hemfrid de Gatton is listed as an early member of the lineage associated with Gatton in Surrey.

  • Death of Hamo de Gatton

    [1]

    Hamo de Gatton, identified in the genealogical material as a member of the family, died in 1165.

  • Death of Robert de Gatton

    [1]

    Robert de Gatton, another recorded member of the lineage, died in 1190.

Products and positioning

A historical Anglo-Norman landed dynasty, not a contemporary consumer or commercial brand.

Sources1 sources

Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/gatton-family · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled