Skip to content

Corporate brand

Unclaimed

A German nonprofit organization that supports people affected by online hate speech and digital violence.

Last updated August 24, 2026

AI crawler reads

No AI crawler has read this profile yet.

Overview

HateAid is a Berlin-based German nonprofit organization focused on protecting human rights and democratic participation in the digital sphere. Established in 2018 by the civil-society organizations Campact and Fearless Democracy together with Anna-Lena von Hodenberg, it developed around the need for practical support for people exposed to online threats, hate comments, harassment, defamation, and other forms of digital violence. The organization describes itself as independent and non-partisan, while concentrating on the effects that online abuse can have on individuals, public debate, and democratic institutions. Its work combines personal counseling, legal guidance, public education, and litigation support. People affected by digital violence may receive initial emotional stabilization, follow-up counseling, help documenting incidents, and assistance in assessing whether criminal or civil remedies are appropriate. In selected cases, HateAid finances legal action through a solidarity fund. The organization seeks to recycle compensation recovered through successful cases into further support for victims, alongside donations and institutional funding. HateAid has become particularly visible through cases involving politicians, journalists, activists, academics, artists, and other public-facing individuals. Its support is not limited to prominent clients, however; the organization states that it assists people who are targeted online without themselves spreading hate. Cases have addressed abusive Facebook posts, politically motivated harassment, anti-Semitic content, threats, sexualized abuse, and the circulation of defamatory or criminal material. HateAid also supports efforts to make platforms identify and remove illegal content more effectively. A significant part of its legal strategy has involved testing the responsibilities of large online platforms in German courts. Its support for Renate Künast helped establish that platforms may need to search for and remove identical or substantially similar unlawful content after a court has determined its illegality. HateAid and the European Union of Jewish Students also pursued proceedings against Twitter, now known as X, over allegedly criminal anti-Semitic and inciting posts, although the Berlin Regional Court dismissed that action on jurisdictional grounds and an appeal followed. The organization has also worked on less conventional forms of online abuse. Since 2022, the Dickstinction.com service has operated within HateAid and provides support to people affected by unsolicited images of male genitalia. Through such projects, HateAid treats digital violence as a broad category that includes not only political hate speech but also sexual harassment and other abusive online conduct. HateAid's funding has included private donations, public grants, foundation support, and other income. Its founding received support from the Robert Bosch Stiftung. The organization has received recognition including the Theodor Heuss Medal, the Rothenburg Prize for Remembrance and Future, the Values Prize for Democracy, and the For.Net Award. Its public profile has also made it a target of criticism from right-leaning media and political commentators, particularly over its funding relationships and perceived proximity to progressive political causes. HateAid maintains that its work is grounded in human rights and the protection of democratic participation online.

History

HateAid was created in Germany in 2018 by Campact, Fearless Democracy, and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg as a dedicated organization for people facing online hate and digital abuse. Its formation reflected growing concern that social-media harassment could silence political participation, damage professional and personal life, and expose individuals to threats without adequate access to legal or psychological support. The organization received founding assistance from the Robert Bosch Stiftung and established itself as a nonprofit limited-liability company headquartered in Berlin. From the beginning, HateAid combined individual assistance with structural advocacy. Its counseling work offers an initial response to people affected by hate comments, threats, and related forms of digital violence. Where appropriate, it helps victims preserve evidence, understand available remedies, and pursue criminal or civil proceedings. A legal-cost fund allows selected cases to proceed even when victims cannot bear the expense. HateAid has stated that compensation from successful claims can help replenish the fund and support additional cases. The organization gained public attention through support for well-known victims, including climate activist Luisa Neubauer, cultural studies scholar Madita Oeming, and several journalists, musicians, politicians, and online personalities. Its client work has illustrated the breadth of digital abuse, from sexist humiliation and defamatory memes to coordinated harassment and threats. HateAid emphasizes that its services are also intended for people outside the public eye who are targeted online and do not themselves promote hate. A central turning point came through litigation involving Renate Künast. HateAid supported efforts to obtain user information from Facebook after allegedly criminal comments were posted about Künast. Although an initial application was rejected, subsequent proceedings progressively recognized more of the comments as punishable insults. Later decisions by the Berlin courts and the Federal Constitutional Court contributed to the legal debate about unlawful online speech and the responsibilities of platforms to remove repeated or substantially similar content. In April 2021, HateAid also supported Künast in a case concerning the deletion of an illegal meme, described by the organization as an important first platform-liability precedent of its kind. In 2023, HateAid and the European Union of Jewish Students brought a case against Twitter, subsequently X, over allegedly criminal anti-Semitic and inciting posts, including alleged Holocaust denial or trivialization. X argued that German courts lacked jurisdiction. The Berlin Regional Court accepted that argument and dismissed the case, while HateAid pursued an appeal. The dispute reflected the organization's broader strategy of using litigation to test how far social-media companies must respond to illegal content under German and European law. HateAid expanded its scope beyond conventional political hate speech through Dickstinction.com, which became part of HateAid gGmbH in 2022. The service addresses unwanted sharing of genital images and provides affected people with reporting and support options. This work reflects HateAid's broader understanding of digital violence as including sexualized harassment and non-consensual abuse, not only ideological hate campaigns. The organization has been supported through a mixture of donations, foundation grants, public funding, and other income. It has received awards including the 2023 Theodor Heuss Medal, the Rothenburg Prize for Remembrance and Future, the Values Prize for Democracy, and the For.Net Award. At the same time, its public role and support from government-linked programs have attracted criticism from right-leaning media outlets and political opponents, who have questioned its funding model and alleged political connections. HateAid presents itself as independent and non-partisan, with its mission centered on human rights, freedom of expression, and democratic participation online. In 2025, the organization's two chief executives became subject to U.S. visa sanctions connected to accusations that they helped pressure American platforms to censor viewpoints. The episode intensified international debate about the boundary between combating unlawful online abuse and influencing platform moderation. HateAid remains an active German organization providing counseling, legal support, strategic litigation, and public education concerning digital violence.

  • 2025

    U.S. sanctions on co-chief executives

    [1]

    The U.S. State Department imposes visa sanctions on HateAid's two co-chief executives amid a dispute over platform moderation and alleged censorship advocacy.

  • 2023

    Theodor Heuss Medal

    [1]

    HateAid receives the Theodor Heuss Medal for its contribution to democratic and human-rights work.

  • 2023

    Proceedings against Twitter/X over anti-Semitic content

    [1]

    HateAid and the European Union of Jewish Students file a case at the Berlin Regional Court concerning allegedly criminal anti-Semitic and inciting posts.

  • 2022

    Dickstinction.com becomes part of HateAid

    [1]

    The organization incorporates a service focused on helping people affected by unsolicited genital images.

  • 2021

    Künast meme litigation advances platform-liability debate

    [1]

    HateAid supports litigation concerning Facebook's duty to remove an illegal defamatory meme and similar material.

  • 2019

    Support for Renate Künast's Facebook proceedings

    [1]

    HateAid supports efforts to identify users responsible for allegedly criminal comments posted about Renate Künast on Facebook.

  • 2018

    HateAid is founded

    [1]

    Campact, Fearless Democracy, and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg establish HateAid in Germany to support people affected by online hate speech and digital violence.

Products and positioning

An independent, human-rights-oriented specialist organization helping individuals respond to online hate, harassment, threats, and other forms of digital violence while advocating stronger accountability for online platforms.

  • Support service · 2018

    Victim counseling

    HateAid provides initial and follow-up counseling for people exposed to online hate, threats, harassment, defamation, and other forms of digital violence. The service can include emotional stabilization, help assessing the incident, guidance on preserving evidence, and advice about reporting or legal escalation.

  • Legal support · 2018

    Legal-cost solidarity fund

    The fund finances selected criminal and civil proceedings for victims who need assistance pursuing claims against perpetrators or online platforms. HateAid uses strategic cases to seek remedies for individuals while also clarifying the legal duties of platforms and improving conditions for future victims.

  • Digital-sexual-abuse support · 2022

    Dickstinction.com

    Dickstinction.com supports people who receive unsolicited images of male genitals. The service forms part of HateAid's broader work on digital violence and helps affected individuals understand reporting and response options.

Controversies

  • 2025

    U.S. visa sanctions against HateAid executives

    The U.S. administration sanctioned Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon over allegations that they participated in organized efforts to pressure American platforms to censor, demonetize, or suppress viewpoints. The action generated controversy because HateAid characterizes its work as rights-based assistance against unlawful digital abuse.

Read more

Brand decisions

  • 2022

    Expand support to unsolicited-image abuseStrategy

    Background

    Digital violence includes sexualized harassment in addition to political hate speech and threats.

    Action taken

    HateAid brought Dickstinction.com into its organizational structure to support people affected by unsolicited genital images.

    Aftermath

    The organization broadened its practical support offering to cover another form of online abuse.

  • 2021

    Use strategic litigation to establish platform dutiesStrategy

    Background

    HateAid sought remedies not only for individual victims but also for clearer rules requiring platforms to address unlawful content and materially similar reuploads.

    Action taken

    It supported Renate Künast's proceedings over Facebook's handling of a defamatory meme and related content.

    Aftermath

    The litigation contributed to court findings that platforms may need to search for and remove identical or similar unlawful material after illegality has been established.

Sources2 sources

Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/hateaid · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled