Skip to content
Brand AI

Vinted

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile4 entries

  1. 2026

    Vinted responds to listings linked to looting in France

    Company response

    Vinted stated that it had taken action to identify and remove listings linked to looting in France, and that it had stepped up monitoring of suspicious listings. The company also said that accounts involved could face permanent bans. The statement addressed listings connected to looting in France and described both removal efforts and increased scrutiny of suspicious activity on the platform, along with the possibility of permanent account bans for those involved.

    Vinted said it had taken action to identify and remove listings linked to looting in France and had stepped up monitoring of suspicious listings. It also said accounts involved could face permanent bans.

    Company response

    • Remediation — Vinted

      Since this weekend, our teams have taken immediate action to identify and remove listings linked to the looting, and we have stepped up monitoring of suspicious listings

    Source excerpt

    • When our rules are breached, we act against the accounts involved, up to permanent bans.
    • Since this weekend, our teams have taken immediate action to identify and remove listings linked to the looting, and we have stepped up monitoring of suspicious listings
    Source

  2. 2024

    GDPR and account-blocking scrutiny

    Data-protection authorities in France, Lithuania, and Poland examined complaints concerning GDPR compliance, blocked accounts, and users’ ability to obtain or control personal data. Lithuania’s authority fined Vinted €2,375,276 in July 2024.

    Source

  3. 2024

    Fraud linked to marketplace interactions

    Swedish police reported around 300 fraud cases in which scammers allegedly used Vinted-related interactions to target users’ bank accounts.

    Source

  4. 2024

    UK safety and privacy concerns

    A Channel 4 documentary examined alleged risks involving sexualized images of underage users and the sale of second-hand baby products without clear safety certification.

    Source