Cabcharge

Cabcharge is an Australian taxi-payment brand whose core account system was established in 1976 to let passengers pay taxi fares without cash. The system combines customer payment instruments, merchant-side transaction processing and a network of taxi-industry equipment and services. Depending on the market and product, Cabcharge instruments have included charge accounts, branded cards, electronic tickets and paper vouchers. Taxi drivers and operators have historically processed these instruments through Cabcharge-supplied manual voucher systems or electronic terminals, with the passenger generally paying a service fee on top of the fare. The brand became deeply embedded in Australia’s taxi ecosystem because payment acceptance was widespread across taxi fleets and connected to other operational technologies. Cabcharge supplied or supported EFTPOS equipment, taximeters, meter-update systems and integrated dispatch-related equipment. Its meters could receive fare updates over mobile networks and through associated electronic equipment, reducing the need to remove vehicles from service for physical meter reconfiguration. The wider commercial model also involved relationships with taxi networks and network service providers, as well as services such as vehicle fit-outs, driver training, taxi cameras, insurance and licence brokerage in parts of the industry. Cabcharge’s market position generated substantial public and regulatory criticism. The principal issue was a 10 percent service fee applied to many card and Cabcharge transactions. Consumer groups, economists, regulators and taxi-industry inquiries questioned whether the fee reflected actual payment-processing costs and argued that the company’s scale, network effects and vertical relationships could limit competition. Critics also contended that the requirement for Cabcharge-branded cards and vouchers to be processed through Cabcharge equipment created barriers for rival payment processors. The Victorian Taxi Industry Inquiry, chaired by Allan Fels, described the company as holding significant historical power in taxi-specific payment instruments and processing and raised concerns about anti-competitive conduct. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission pursued competition-law concerns involving Cabcharge, including issues relating to access to the processing of Cabcharge-branded payment instruments. The company was also involved in adverse court proceedings and a major settlement connected with the conduct criticised in the market. Separately, the consumer organisation Choice gave Cabcharge a 2012 Shonky Award for the 10 percent surcharge, reflecting public concern about the transparency and size of the charge. State-level regulatory changes subsequently reduced permitted taxi payment surcharges in several Australian jurisdictions. Victoria legislated for a maximum surcharge of 5 percent or less from February 2014, New South Wales reduced the surcharge to 5 percent from December 2014, and Western Australia reduced it to 5 percent in February 2015. These measures weakened the commercial significance of the historic 10 percent charge, although the broader Cabcharge payment infrastructure and brand continued to be used within the taxi sector. Cabcharge Australia later changed its corporate identity to A2B Australia. The Cabcharge payment system remained a brand and operating service rather than disappearing with the corporate name change. A2B Australia subsequently became part of ComfortDelGro, while Cabcharge operations in the United Kingdom and Singapore have been associated with other ComfortDelGro subsidiaries. The brand is therefore best understood today as a taxi-payment and mobility-technology service within a larger transport group, with its historical importance rooted in Australia’s regulated taxi and payment infrastructure.

Cabcharge originated in Australia in 1976 as a system for paying taxi fares without cash. Its initial proposition was comparatively simple: employers, organizations and other account customers could arrange taxi travel and settle fares through a centralized account rather than requiring passengers to carry cash. Over time, the system expanded into a broader payment network involving branded cards, electronic tickets and paper vouchers. Taxi drivers and operators could accept these instruments and submit transactions through manual voucher procedures or Cabcharge electronic terminals. The company’s growth was reinforced by the structure of the Australian taxi industry. Cabcharge payment instruments were accepted across a large number of taxis, while the company’s processing equipment was installed widely throughout the sector. This created network effects: customers valued a payment instrument that could be used in many taxis, and taxi operators valued equipment that could accept the payment instruments most likely to be presented by passengers. Cabcharge also became involved in the supply of EFTPOS terminals and other equipment used for ordinary debit and credit card payments. From late 2004, Cabcharge expanded into taximeters and related systems. Its equipment could record fares and receive updates remotely through mobile communications and associated electronic systems. The company’s offering increasingly connected payments with dispatch, fare measurement and other taxi-vehicle technologies. Its commercial activities also extended through relationships with network service providers and other taxi-industry businesses. These relationships could include vehicle fit-outs, driver training, taxi cameras, insurance and licence-related services. The company’s commercial model became controversial, particularly because of the 10 percent service fee associated with many electronic or account-based taxi payments. Supporters of the fee could characterize it as a charge supporting the payment network, equipment and related services. Critics argued that it was substantially higher than ordinary card-processing costs and that the company’s dominant position allowed it to maintain the charge with limited competitive pressure. The controversy intensified as electronic payments became more common and consumers became more aware of payment surcharges in other sectors. Allan Fels, a former chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, raised concerns about taxi payment surcharges with the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2011. The Victorian Taxi Industry Inquiry subsequently examined Cabcharge’s role in detail. Its findings described high concentration in taxi payment instruments and processing, strong network effects, and concerns that Cabcharge’s control over its branded cards and vouchers could make it difficult for competing processors to enter the market. The inquiry also examined the company’s relationships with taxi networks and network service providers, concluding that vertical integration and related equipment services could reinforce market power. Competition concerns also led to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission proceedings and a significant settlement associated with the company’s payment-processing practices. The public controversy was reinforced in 2012 when Choice gave Cabcharge a Shonky Award for the 10 percent surcharge. These events made Cabcharge a prominent example in Australian debates about payment surcharges, regulated transport markets and the effects of network concentration. Government intervention reduced the permitted surcharge in several states. Victoria introduced a 5 percent-or-less limit from February 2014, New South Wales reduced its limit to 5 percent from December 2014, and Western Australia did so in February 2015. The changes did not eliminate Cabcharge’s payment infrastructure, but they reduced the scope for the historic 10 percent charge and altered the economics of taxi card acceptance. Cabcharge Australia later adopted the corporate name A2B Australia. The Cabcharge name continued as a customer-facing payment-system brand. A2B Australia subsequently became part of ComfortDelGro, a transport group with taxi and mobility operations in multiple countries. Cabcharge-related services in the United Kingdom and Singapore are operated through other ComfortDelGro subsidiaries. The brand’s present significance is consequently both historical and operational: it remains associated with cashless taxi payment, while its former corporate owner identity has been superseded by A2B Australia and its wider group ownership.

• 2015

  Western Australia surcharge reduced

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  Western Australia reduced the permitted taxi payment surcharge to 5 percent.

• 2014

  New South Wales surcharge reduced

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  New South Wales reduced the permitted taxi payment surcharge to 5 percent.

• 2013

  Victorian surcharge reform legislated

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  Victoria legislated a limit of 5 percent or less for taxi payment surcharges, effective from February 2014.

• 2012

  Choice Shonky Award

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  Consumer group Choice gave Cabcharge a Shonky Award for its 10 percent taxi payment surcharge.

• 2011

  Payment surcharge concerns reach the Reserve Bank

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  Concerns about taxi payment surcharges were raised with the Reserve Bank of Australia amid broader scrutiny of card surcharging.

• 2004

  Expansion into taximeters

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  Cabcharge began supplying taximeters and related fare-update technology, broadening its role beyond payment accounts.

• 1976

  Cabcharge account payment system established

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  Cabcharge established an account-based system enabling taxi passengers to pay fares through non-cash instruments.

• Corporate identity changes to A2B Australia

  [1]Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org

  Cabcharge Australia subsequently adopted the A2B Australia corporate identity while retaining Cabcharge as a payment-system brand.

A specialized taxi-payment and mobility-technology platform connecting corporate and account customers, taxi passengers, drivers, operators and taxi networks. Historically positioned around broad acceptance, integrated fleet equipment and cashless taxi payments, while also becoming associated with criticism of high surcharges and market concentration.

• Taxi payment accounts · 1976

  Cabcharge accounts

  Account-based arrangements that allow organizations or customers to pay taxi fares and related charges without cash. The system historically used Cabcharge cards, electronic tickets and paper vouchers, with transactions settled through the Cabcharge network.

• Payment infrastructure

  Cabcharge payment processing

  Manual and electronic processing infrastructure for taxi payments. Drivers could submit paper instruments through voucher procedures or use Cabcharge-supplied EFTPOS terminals to process Cabcharge and other non-cash payments.

• Payment instruments

  Cabcharge cards and eTickets

  Branded payment instruments used by account customers for taxi travel. Their broad acceptance helped create network effects, but the requirement that Cabcharge instruments be processed through compatible equipment was also central to competition concerns.

• Taxi equipment · 2004

  Taxi meters and remote updates

  Taximeters record the fare for each journey and must be updated when regulated fares change. Cabcharge’s system supported remote updates through mobile communications and associated electronic equipment, avoiding some of the downtime associated with physical installation.

• Fleet and dispatch technology

  Integrated taxi technology

  A broader collection of in-vehicle and network services linking payment processing with meters, dispatch and other taxi equipment. Related industry services historically included vehicle fit-outs, taxi cameras, driver training, insurance and licence brokerage.

• 2012

  Criticism of the 10 percent payment surcharge

  Cabcharge faced sustained criticism that its 10 percent surcharge on card and account-based taxi payments was excessive relative to payment-processing costs. Choice highlighted the issue by giving the company a 2012 Shonky Award.

  Source

• Competition concerns over payment processing and vertical integration

  The company was criticized by taxi-industry investigators and competition authorities over the alleged use of network effects, exclusive processing arrangements and relationships with taxi network providers to protect its position in payment instruments and processing.

  Source

Read more

• 2013

  Adapt to state surcharge regulationStrategy

  Background

  Public and regulatory criticism focused on the historic 10 percent surcharge applied to many taxi payment transactions.

  Action taken

  The business continued operating its payment network as Australian states introduced lower surcharge limits, beginning with Victoria’s 5 percent-or-less limit.

  Aftermath

  The regulatory changes reduced the allowable surcharge in affected states while leaving the underlying payment infrastructure in operation.

  Source

• 2004

  Enter the taximeter and integrated taxi-equipment marketProduct launch

  Background

  Cabcharge’s established payment network provided a platform for expanding into equipment used directly inside taxis.

  Action taken

  The company began supplying taximeters and related systems capable of receiving fare updates remotely.

  Aftermath

  Cabcharge became more integrated into taxi operations, linking payment, fare measurement and other in-vehicle functions.

  Source

• Continue the Cabcharge brand under A2B AustraliaStrategy

  Background

  The corporate business later moved away from the Cabcharge Australia name.

  Action taken

  The company adopted the A2B Australia identity while retaining Cabcharge for its established taxi payment system.

  Aftermath

  Cabcharge remained a customer-facing service brand, while A2B Australia became the relevant corporate identity and later part of ComfortDelGro.

  Source

1. 1Cabchargeen.wikipedia.org