跳到正文

耐克

争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 25 条 · 第 2 / 2 页

  1. 2020

    乔丹体育就涉及亚马逊和酷买网的商标案件提起上诉

    提起诉讼

    乔丹体育在一审败诉后,就两起涉及销售耐克旗下“AJ”球鞋并标注“乔丹”字样的案件提起上诉。乔丹体育称该标注侵害其对相关字样的专用权,案件正在进一步审理中。

    来源摘录

    • 近日,北京知识产权法院受理了两件因销售“AJ”球鞋但标注“乔丹”而引发的上诉案件。乔丹体育指出,酷买网和亚马逊在销售耐克公司旗下“AJ”球鞋的过程中标注了“乔丹”字样,侵害了其对该字样的专用权。一审败诉后,该公司选择继续上诉,目前该案正在进一步审理中。
  2. 2020

    一家人提起民权诉讼,指控Nike存在种族画像行为

    提起诉讼

    Joel Stallworth和TaMiya Dickerson对Nike及一名前员工提起联邦民权诉讼,指称一名门店经理对他们进行种族画像并错误指控他们盗窃。相关内容是诉讼指控,并非法院认定。

    品牌回应

    • 道歉 — Nike

      Nike said in a statement that it had reached out to the couple to "express our deepest apologies."
    • 人事处理 — Nike

      Magee was fired, and subsequently filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against the company, according to the family's complaint.

    来源摘录

    • A Black family that alleges they were racially profiled and wrongly accused of shoplifting by a manager at Nike's Santa Monica store filed a federal civil rights lawsuit Saturday against the athletic apparel company and the former employee.
    • In the federal civil rights suit filed on Saturday, Joel Stallworth and wife TaMiya Dickerson claim they were accused by white store manager Wendy Magee of stealing a $12 child-sized basketball from the Santa Monica outpost.
    • Nike Inc. has been hit with a lawsuit by a Black family who alleges they were victims of racial profiling at the retailer's Santa Monica, Calif. store in July 2019.
  3. 2019

    前承包商起诉耐克,指控职场歧视

    提起诉讼

    一名前耐克承包商对耐克及人力资源公司 Mainz Brady 提起民事诉讼,索赔 110 万美元,并指控其因同事使用代词问题而遭受基于性别认同的歧视、骚扰和报复。相关内容属于诉讼指控;所提供的报道未说明法院已作出认定。

    品牌回应

    • 否认 — Nike

      “Lyles was a mediocre [contractor] with a limited skill set…Lyles' allegations are without merit.”

    来源摘录

    • A former Nike contractor has filed a civil lawsuit seeking $1.1 million from footwear manufacturer Nike and the IT staffing firm it employs, over workplace harassment complaints stemming from coworkers’ failure to use “nonbinary” gender pronouns in her presence.
    • Lyles says she requested from the outset to be referred to by “they,” “them,” or “their,” but across multiple assignments was repeatedly “misgendered” by Nike employees and Mainz Brady contractors alike.
    • The law firm representing Nike, Stoel Rives, was more candid: “Lyles was a mediocre [contractor] with a limited skill set…Lyles' allegations are without merit.”
  4. 2018

    Dream Crazy广告活动引发反弹

    在Dream Crazy中使用科林·卡佩尼克引发了政治和文化争议。一些消费者呼吁抵制并传播损坏耐克产品的图片,而另一些人则公开支持该活动及其信息。

  5. 1990

    供应链劳工和工厂条件批评

    耐克长期面临关于合同制造商中劳动条件、工资、工作场所安全、工人权利和透明度的批评。公司随后制定了供应商标准、监测计划和人权政策以回应这些关切。