Skip to content

Samsung

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile35 entries · Page 1 of 2

  1. 2026

    Samsung customers complain over spoiled food after update bricks AI smart fridges

    Issue disclosure

    According to Fortune, Samsung customers are complaining to the company over spoiled food after a software update bricked Samsung AI smart fridges. The incident, reported as a controversy involving the brand, centers on the software update rendering the AI smart fridges unusable, which customers say led to food spoilage. The complaints were directed at Samsung following the update.

  2. 2026

    India investigates LG and Samsung over alleged tariff evasion on OLED TV parts

    Investigation

    Reuters reports that LG and Samsung are facing an investigation in India over alleged tariff evasion involving OLED TV parts. The report states that the investigation concerns the two companies and the alleged evasion of tariffs on components used in OLED televisions. No further details about the investigation, its findings, or its consequences were provided in the source.

    Source excerpt

    • EXCLUSIVE: LG, Samsung face India tariff evasion investigation over OLED TV parts
  3. 2024

    Acquittal in the Samsung C&T–Cheil Industries merger case

    A South Korean court acquitted Lee Jae-yong of financial-crime allegations related to the 2015 merger. The acquittal was subsequently upheld by the country’s highest court.

  4. 2022

    Samsung corrects Galaxy S22 display refresh-rate specifications

    Issue disclosure

    Samsung corrected specifications in its press materials for the Galaxy S22 and Galaxy S22+, changing the stated variable refresh-rate range from 10–120Hz to 48–120Hz. According to the report, Samsung did not proactively inform the public about the correction. The change concerns the refresh-rate figures listed in the promotional materials rather than any other aspect of the devices.

    Samsung corrected specifications in its Galaxy S22 and S22+ press materials, changing the stated variable refresh-rate range from 10–120Hz to 48–120Hz. The article reports that Samsung did not proactively tell the public about the correction.

    Company response

    • Clarification — Samsung

      Samsung 及後作出了修正,在新的新聞稿和資料中改成了 Super Smooth 120Hz Refresh Rate (48~120Hz)

    Source excerpt

    • Samsung 在預訂開始後靜靜地修改了上述資料,卻未有向公眾主動提及
    • 資料出錯的是 Galaxy S22 和 Galaxy S22+,原本在新聞稿和宣傳資料提及,兩款手機的螢幕為 Super Smooth 120Hz Refresh Rate (10~120Hz)
    • Samsung 及後作出了修正,在新的新聞稿和資料中改成了 Super Smooth 120Hz Refresh Rate (48~120Hz),跟去年發表的 Galaxy S21 和 Galaxy S21+ 相同。
  5. 2022

    Caltech adds Samsung to patent litigation

    Lawsuit filed

    In a controversy noted in 2022, the California Institute of Technology added Samsung to a patent litigation matter. According to the source, the case alleges infringement involving Wi-Fi products and patents covering error-correction codes. The source does not report a determination on the allegations, and no outcome or ruling is stated.

    California Institute of Technology added a case against Samsung, alleging infringement involving Wi-Fi products and patents covering error-correction codes. The source does not report a determination on the allegations.

    Source excerpt

    • Caltech targets Samsung over the provision of various “Wi-Fi products”
    • California Institute of Technology (Caltech) has added a case against Samsung (2:21-cv-00446) to the litigation campaign
  6. 2022

    Samsung CEO apologizes for application throttling

    Company response

    Samsung Vice Chairman and CEO Jong-Hee Han apologized to Samsung users for throttling thousands of applications. He said Samsung would listen to customers more closely to help prevent a recurrence.

    Company response

    • Apology — Samsung

      Samsung’s Vice Chairman and CEO, Jong-Hee Han, has issued an official and formal apology to Samsung users for throttling thousands of applications.
    • Apology — Samsung

      Samsung Device Experience division CEO JH Han said the company failed to appreciate customer concerns over the issue and bowed in apology

    Source excerpt

    • Samsung’s Vice Chairman and CEO, Jong-Hee Han, has issued an official and formal apology to Samsung users for throttling thousands of applications.
    • Samsung Electronics Vice Chairman and co-CEO Han Jong-hee on Wednesday apologised for controversy around recently launched Galaxy S22 smartphone performance due to a pre-installed app.
    • Samsung Device Experience division CEO JH Han said the company failed to appreciate customer concerns over the issue and bowed in apology
  7. 2022

    Samsung confirms cybersecurity breach exposing company data

    Issue disclosure

    Samsung confirmed that it suffered a cybersecurity breach that exposed company data, including source code for Galaxy smartphones. The company said the stolen data did not include employees’ or users’ personal information.

    Company response

    • Remediation — Samsung

      After the cybersecurity breach, necessary steps for security had been immediately taken, The Korean electronics giant said

    Source excerpt

    • After the cybersecurity breach, necessary steps for security had been immediately taken, The Korean electronics giant said, but did not confirm which group had hacked their data.
    • Lapus$ takes responsibility for stealing source code of Galaxy devices
    • Samsung has confirmed it suffered a cybersecurity breach that had exposed company data, including the source code for the operation of Galaxy smartphones, reported.Bloomberg News
  8. 2022

    Samsung confirms security breach involving internal data

    Issue disclosure

    Samsung confirmed a security breach involving some internal company data after hackers obtained and leaked confidential data, including source code. Samsung said the breach did not include customers’ or employees’ personal information and that it had implemented measures to prevent further incidents. Qualcomm said it was working with Samsung to determine whether any Qualcomm data had been affected.

    Company response

    • Remediation — Samsung

      We have implemented measures to prevent further such incidents
    • Investigation — Qualcomm

      We take these claims very seriously and are working expeditiously with Samsung to understand the scope of the incident, as well as to confirm what Qualcomm data, if any, has been impacted.
    • Clarification — Samsung

      the breach involves some source codes relating to the operation of Galaxy devices but does not include the personal information of our consumers or employees
    • Remediation — Samsung

      The Korean firm said it has strengthened its security system to avoid future breaches

    Source excerpt

    • Samsung has confirmed a security breach after hackers obtained and leaked almost 200 gigabytes of confidential data, including source code for various technologies and algorithms for biometric unlock operations.
    • A spokesperson for Samsung confirmed a “security breach” related to some internal company data but said no personal data belonging to customers or employees was accessed by the hackers.
    • We have implemented measures to prevent further such incidents and will continue to serve our customers without disruption.
  9. 2021

    Samsung sued over Galaxy S20 camera glass

    Lawsuit filed

    In 2021, owners of Galaxy S20 series devices filed a lawsuit against Samsung, alleging that the glass on the camera module fractured or shattered without external force. The suit accuses Samsung of fraud, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer-protection laws. The report does not state that a court has reached any determination in the matter.

    Galaxy S20 series owners filed a lawsuit against Samsung, alleging that camera-module glass fractured or shattered without external force. The suit accuses Samsung of fraud, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer-protection laws; the article does not report a court determination.

    Source excerpt

    • The lawsuit was filed by disgruntled Galaxy S20 series owners facing issues with the camera module's glass fracturing or shattering without any external force being applied to it.
    • According to law firm Hagens Berman (via XDA), the lawsuit accuses Samsung of fraud, breach of warranty, and violations of several consumer-protection laws.
  10. 2021

    Consumers sue Samsung over Galaxy S20 camera glass defect

    Lawsuit filed

    Consumers filed a lawsuit against Samsung alleging that the camera glass on Galaxy S20 smartphones shattered unexpectedly and that Samsung did not disclose the defect. The suit, filed on April 27, accuses Samsung of fraud, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer-protection laws. These are allegations made in the lawsuit and have not been established as fact.

    Consumers sued Samsung, alleging that Galaxy S20 smartphone camera glass shattered unexpectedly and that Samsung did not disclose the defect. The lawsuit, filed April 27, accuses Samsung of fraud, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer-protection laws; these are allegations in the suit.

    Source excerpt

    • Customers are suing Samsung for not disclosing a defect that caused Samsung Galaxy S20 smartphone cameras to shatter unexpectedly.
    • The lawsuit was filed on April 27 and accuses Samsung of fraud, breach of warranty, and violations of several consumer-protection laws.
  11. 2021

    Samsung sued over alleged vape pen battery defect

    Lawsuit filed

    A federal court complaint filed in Arizona alleges that a defective e-cigarette battery made by Samsung SDI exploded and injured a father and his infant son in 2019. The plaintiffs sued Samsung and Red Star Vapor, asserting seven product-liability-related causes of action and seeking damages and other relief. The allegations are presented as claims in the complaint, not as court findings.

    A federal court complaint filed in Arizona last week alleges that Samsung SDI made a defective e-cigarette battery that exploded and injured a father and his infant son in 2019. The plaintiffs sued Samsung and Red Star Vapor, asserting seven product-liability-related causes of action and seeking damages and other relief; the allegations are not presented as court findings.

    Source excerpt

    • A case filed in federal court in Arizona last week claims that Korea’s Samsung SDI Co. Ltd. made a defective e-cigarette battery that exploded injuring two of the plaintiffs, a father and infant son in 2019.
    • The complaint, filed not only against Samsung, but also the brick-and-mortar store the father allegedly purchased the vape pen from, Red Star Vapor LLC, states seven product liability-related causes of action.
  12. 2021

    South Korean FTC fines five Samsung affiliates over cafeteria business

    Fine or penalty

    In 2021, South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined five Samsung affiliates — Samsung Electronics, Samsung Display, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, Samsung SDI and Welstory — a total of 234.9 billion won over allegedly unfair internal trading involving an in-house cafeteria business. Samsung called the decision regretful and argued that its employee-welfare efforts had been misread as unfair business support.

    South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined Samsung Electronics, Samsung Display, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, Samsung SDI and Welstory a total of 234.9 billion won over allegedly unfair internal trading involving an in-house cafeteria business. Samsung called the decision regretful and argued that its employee-welfare efforts had been misread as unfair business support.

    Company response

    • Denial — Samsung

      In a statement, Samsung called the FTC's decision “regretful,” arguing the firm's efforts for the well-being of its employees has been “misread as unfair business support.”

    Source excerpt

    • The antitrust watchdog said it will file complaints with the prosecution against Samsung Electronics and Choi.
    • The Fair Trade Commission (FTC) fined five major affiliates of Samsung nearly 235 billion won in total, Thursday, for their allegedly unfair internal trading involving an in-house cafeteria business.
  13. 2021

    Dutch watchdog fined Samsung over television price coordination

    Fine or penalty

    In 2021, the Dutch consumer watchdog ACM fined Samsung over €39 million over the coordination of online television prices. According to ACM, Samsung influenced online television prices by urging seven retailers to raise prices. Samsung said it was appealing the fine. The regulator's action concerned Samsung's influence on pricing by retailers rather than a finding described in further detail in the available source.

    Company response

    • Ongoing disclosure — Samsung

      Samsung said it is appealing against the fine.

    Source excerpt

    • Samsung said it is appealing against the fine.
    • Dutch consumer watchdog ACM has fined Samsung over €39m for influencing the online prices of television sets between 2013 and 2018.
    • Samsung exerted undue influence on the online sales prices of televisions of seven retailers from January 2013 to December 2018.
  14. 2021

    Samsung says Russian-app notification was an error

    Issue disclosure

    Samsung said an update notification sent to a limited number of UK customers incorrectly stated that Russian government-mandated apps had been downloaded; it said no Russian apps were installed. Samsung attributed the wording to a technical error and apologised.

    Company response

    • Apology — Samsung

      We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused by this.

    Source excerpt

    • We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused by this.
    • We can confirm that the wording of the message was incorrect and shared with a limited number of UK customers due to a technical error.
    • Phone-maker Samsung has apologised for a software update sent to UK customers stating Russian government-mandated apps had been downloaded.
  15. 2021

    Samsung fined €40 million over Dutch TV pricing

    Fine or penalty

    The Dutch consumer watchdog ACM fined Samsung €40 million over alleged price fixing of TVs in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2018. ACM said Samsung's price recommendations encouraged retailers to keep prices above market rates. Samsung said it would appeal and maintained it had not forced retailers to adopt its pricing advice.

    Company response

    • Denial — Samsung

      Samsung has already said it will appeal the fine and maintained that it never forced retailers to adopt its price advice.

    Source excerpt

    • Samsung has just been fined a whopping €40 million for supposedly fixing the prices of its TVs in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2018.
    • Samsung has already said it will appeal the fine and maintained that it never forced retailers to adopt its price advice.
    • Dutch consumer watchdog ACM says Samsung set 'price recommendations', which encouraged major retailers to keep prices above market rate.
  16. 2021

    Samsung fined for television price fixing in the Netherlands

    Fine or penalty

    The Dutch competition watchdog ACM fined Samsung 40 million euros for price fixing. The regulator said Samsung had urged retailers to raise television prices and that its efforts went beyond normal guidance and structurally determined market prices. Samsung said it would appeal and denied forcing retailers to use its price advice.

    Company response

    • Denial — Samsung

      Samsung said it would appeal the fine, as it maintained it had never forced retailers to use its price advice and that stores had always been free to determine their own strategy.

    Source excerpt

    • The market regulator said Samsung had pushed up the prices of its televisions in the Netherlands for years, by constantly urging retailers to raise their prices if they were selling them below Samsung's preferred market rate.
    • Samsung has been fined 40 million euros ($46.9 million) for price fixing in the Netherlands, Dutch competition watchdog ACM said on Wednesday.
  17. 2021

    Ericsson and Samsung settle global patent dispute

    Settlement

    Ericsson and Samsung reached a multi-year global patent-licensing agreement covering patents related to cellular technologies and sales of network infrastructure and phones from January 1, 2021. The agreement settled their dispute and ended complaints before the USITC and lawsuits in multiple countries.

    Source excerpt

    • 爱立信与三星已经就两家公司之间的全球专利许可达成了一项多年期协议,其中包括与所有蜂窝技术相关的专利。
    • 这一和解结束了两家公司向美国国际贸易委员会(USITC)提出的申诉以及在多个国家/地区正在进行的诉讼
  18. 2021

    Jury finds Samsung liable for patent infringement

    Ruling

    A jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found Samsung liable to Solas OLED for wilfully infringing two patents. The jury awarded Solas $62,738,543 in damages.

    Source excerpt

    • After a five-day trial, the jury awarded Solas $62,738,543 in damages for infringement of the two patents.
    • Solas OLED Ltd. ("Solas"), an Irish company that specializes in patented OLED technologies, today announced that a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has found Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively "Samsung") liable to Solas for wilfully infringing two Solas patents, U.S. patent numbers 7,446,338 and 9,256,311.
  19. 2021

    Which? sues Qualcomm over patent licensing fees

    Lawsuit filed

    UK consumer organization Which? filed a lawsuit against Qualcomm, alleging abuse of market dominance through its patent licensing and chip supply practices and seeking more than $600 million in compensation.

    Stated objective. Which? is seeking compensation for eligible consumers who bought Apple or Samsung smartphones from 1 October 2015 onward.

    Source excerpt

    • 在苹果与高通和解近两年之后,高通又因为专利授权费在英国引发了官司,他们被英国消费者权益维护机构起诉滥用市场地位,收取了过高的专利授权费,要求索赔超过6亿美元。
    • 起诉高通滥用市场主导地位的,是英国的消费者权益维护机构Which?,他们认为高通不向竞争对手授权专利、不向未向高通支付高额专利授权费的智能手机厂商供应芯片的做法,是滥用市场地位,是违反竞争法的反竞争策略,向苹果和三星收取了过高的专利授权费,导致智能手机价格的上升。
    • Which?官网的信息显示,他们已经向竞争上诉法庭提起了诉讼
  20. 2020

    Samsung discloses user-data exposure on its UK website

    Issue disclosure

    Samsung disclosed that a technical error on its website allowed a small number of users to access another user's details. The company stated that the incident was unrelated to the Find My Mobile push notification issue. No further details about the number of affected users, the specific data involved, or the outcome were provided in the available summary.

    Samsung said a technical error allowed a small number of users to access another user's details on its website. The company said the incident was unrelated to the Find My Mobile push notification issue.

    Company response

    • Remediation — Samsung

      As soon as we became aware of the incident, we removed the ability to log in to the store on our website until the issue was fixed.
    • Ongoing disclosure — Samsung

      We will be contacting those affected by the issue with further details.

    Source excerpt

    • “A technical error resulted in a small number of users being able to access the details of another user,” Samsung said in a statement reported by The Register.
    • A technical error resulted in a small number of users being able to access the details of another user.