Controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile111 entries · Page 1 of 6
2026
Fair Credit Reporting Act settlement
The Department of Justice announced a $2.25 million civil penalty and injunction resolving allegations that Amazon did not provide certain identity-theft victims with requested transaction records within the required time.
2026
Amazon Alexa Plus bug causes Echo speakers to repeatedly sing 'lalala'
Issue disclosure
In October 2026, an Alexa Plus bug caused some Amazon Echo smart speakers to repeatedly say or sing 'lalala' for minutes at a time, often mid-conversation. When asked about the behavior, the assistant apparently was unaware of it. Users reported the issue on Reddit repeatedly over recent weeks across multiple Echo speaker models. Amazon said it was aware of the issue, describing it as a bug affecting a small number of Alexa Plus users, and that a fix was in the works.
An Alexa Plus bug has caused some Amazon Echo smart speakers to repeatedly say or sing 'lalala' for minutes at a time, often mid-conversation, with the assistant apparently unaware of the behavior when asked. Users have reported the issue on Reddit repeatedly over recent weeks across multiple Echo speaker models. Amazon said it is aware of the issue, describing it as a bug affecting a small number of Alexa Plus users, and that a fix is in the works.
Company response
Clarification — Amazon
told Android Authority in a statement that it’s a bug affecting “a small number of Alexa Plus” users
Remediation — Amazon
with a fix in the works
Source excerpt
Amazon is aware of the issue, and told Android Authority in a statement that it’s a bug affecting “a small number of Alexa Plus” users, with a fix in the works.
An unsettling Alexa Plus bug has seen some Amazon Echo smart home speakers reduced to saying — and sometimes singing — nothing but “lalala” on repeat for minutes at a time, often in the middle of conversations with users.
The issue has been reported on Reddit repeatedly over the last few weeks, as recently as three days ago
2026
Apple and Amazon face revived UK consumer lawsuit over product sales
Lawsuit filed
Reuters reported that Apple and Amazon are facing a revived consumer lawsuit in the United Kingdom over product sales. The event is recorded as a controversy note for Amazon. The available source summary does not provide further details about the legal claims, the products involved, the court's reasoning, or the outcome. The event date is September 28, 2026. The report identifies the matter as a revived UK consumer lawsuit concerning product sales. No additional people, amounts, or rulings are included in the source summary. The case is described only at that level, and the report is attributed to Reuters.
Source excerpt
Apple and Amazon face revived UK consumer lawsuit over product sales
2026
Amazon worker alleges assault on work trip, says company refused transfer
Issue disclosure
An Amazon worker alleges being assaulted while on a work trip and says the company refused a transfer request. The allegation was reported by Human Resources Director. The event is dated 2026-10-09.
Source excerpt
Amazon worker alleges assault on work trip, says company refused transfer
4 women sue Amazon, alleging the company denied pregnancy accommodations and fired a worker after an emergency
Nov. 10, 2019
2026
Amazon publishes blog urging support for AI data centers amid community backlash
Company response
On October 2, 2026, Amazon published a blog post by AWS CEO Matt Garman addressing public concerns about AI data centers' impact on jobs, power demands, and the environment. The post warned that more than 100 data center moratoriums under consideration across the US could cause lasting harm to the US economy and national security. Amazon outlined a 'Data Center Commitment' covering job creation, preventing increases to local energy rates, and a pledge to invest more than $1 billion to support communities neighboring its data centers. Amazon also said it no longer uses nondisclosure agreements with government agencies, following scrutiny from Democratic lawmaker Jamie Raskin regarding secret deals with local officials.
On October 2, 2026, Amazon published a more than 3,000-word blog by AWS CEO Matt Garman pushing back on public concerns about the impact of AI data centers on jobs, power demands, and the environment, warning that more than 100 data center moratoriums under consideration across the US could cause lasting harm to the US economy and national security. The memorandum codifies a 'Data Center Commitment' covering job creation, preventing increases to local energy rates, and a pledge to invest more than $1 billion to support communities neighboring its data centers. Amazon also said it no longer uses nondisclosure agreements with government agencies, after Democratic lawmaker Jamie Raskin probed tech companies about secret deals with local officials.
Stated objective. Calling for public support of AI data center projects, warning that blocking them risks irreparable harm to the US economy and national security ('our nation can't afford to lose' the race for AI dominance).
Company response
Clarification — Amazon
In a more than 3,000 word blog posted today, Amazon web services CEO Matt Garman pushed back on public concerns around the impact that data centers may have on jobs, power demands, and the environment
Ongoing disclosure — Amazon
Additionally, Amazon says it no longer uses nondisclosure agreements with government agencies, after Democratic lawmaker Jamie Raskin probed tech companies about the secret deals with local officials.
Remediation — Amazon
Amazon recently followed Microsoft’s lead and said it will no longer use nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) while negotiating with local governments over data centers.
Remediation — Amazon
Source excerpt
This comes as support for AI data centers has plummeted in polls , and face increasing backlash from the US communities where they’re being built, with nationwide concerns growing over AI safety and what impact the technology will have on society if left unchecked.
In a more than 3,000 word blog posted today, Amazon web services CEO Matt Garman pushed back on public concerns around the impact that data centers may have on jobs, power demands, and the environment, saying “our nation can’t afford to lose” the race for AI dominance.
Amazon is calling for people to support AI data center projects, or risk irreparable harm to the US economy and national security.
2026
Sen. Warren and Senate Democrats send letters to Meta, Google, Amazon and Microsoft seeking information on AI tax subsidies
Investigation
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., joined by Democratic Sens. Tina Smith and Jeff Merkley, sent letters Sunday night to the CEOs of Meta, Google, Amazon and Microsoft seeking information on tax deductions the companies claimed for AI and data center development under the 2025 'one big beautiful bill' act and on their lobbying efforts ahead of the bill's passage. The letters cite falling corporate tax payments even as revenues rise, and request answers by Oct. 12. Spokespeople for all four companies did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Stated objective. Seek information on tax deductions claimed related to AI and data center development and on lobbying efforts in the lead-up to the passage of the 2025 'one big beautiful bill' act, with answers requested by Oct. 12.
Source excerpt
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and other Senate Democrats sent letters to the CEOs of Meta, Google, Amazon and Microsoft seeking information on tax subsidies for AI and data center development they say was authorized by the GOP-led "one big beautiful bill" act.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren , D-Mass., led the letters, which were sent Sunday night and shared exclusively with CNBC, to the CEOs of the four companies asking for information on tax deductions they've claimed related to AI and data center development and on their lobbying efforts in the lead-up to the passage of the 2025 legislation, known more commonly as the "one big beautiful bill" act .
They requested answers from each company by Oct. 12.
2026
Twitch streamer sues Amazon and Twitch over alleged AI training use of streams
Lawsuit filed
Twitch streamer Warren Pandiscia filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Twitch and its parent company Amazon. The suit alleges that the companies used his streams to develop AI products without permission or licensing fees. According to the filing, data collection allegedly occurred for at least two years before Twitch updated its terms of service and added an AI opt-out option.
Source excerpt
Pandiscia alleged in his complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Twitch streamer Warren Pandiscia has sued Twitch and its parent company, Amazon, alleging that they used his streams to develop AI products without obtaining permission or paying licensing fees.
According to the complaint, the alleged data collection had been taking place for at least two years.
2026
Amazon fined Rs 1 lakh by CCPA over unauthorized 'Shri Ram Mandir Ayodhya Prasad' listings
Fine or penalty
India's Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) fined Amazon Rs 1 lakh for allowing ordinary sweets to be sold online as 'Shri Ram Mandir Ayodhya Prasad' without authorization from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. The CCPA rejected Amazon's claim that it was merely an intermediary and directed Amazon to deposit the penalty within 15 days, and extended directions covering listings associated with 10 major religious institutions.
Source excerpt
Amazon has been fined Rs 1 lakh by the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) for allowing ordinary sweets to be sold online as ‘Shri Ram Mandir Ayodhya Prasad’, with the consumer watchdog ruling that the e-commerce platform cannot avoid responsibility by describing itself merely as an intermediary, according to India Today.
The authority said the unauthorised commercial use of the temple’s name could hurt the religious sentiments of millions of consumers.
The CCPA has directed Amazon to deposit the Rs 1 lakh penalty within 15 days after finding that sweets sold under the ‘Bihari Brothers’ brand by Chandu Trading Company were marketed as Ayodhya Ram temple prasad without authenticated permission from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust.
2026
Amazon fined $2.25 million to resolve DOJ identity theft records case
Fine or penalty
The Justice Department said Amazon.com would pay a $2.25 million civil penalty to resolve allegations that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to provide identity theft victims requested transaction records involving potential perpetrators within 30 days. A federal judge entered a stipulated order imposing the penalty and requiring Amazon to provide those records free of charge within 30 days of a request and to post a notice on its website explaining how victims can request them.
Source excerpt
A federal judge has entered a stipulated order resolving allegations that Amazon violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to provide records, either at all or at least within 30 days of a request, of transaction records involving people believed to have fraudulently used victims' identification.
The order imposes a $2.25 million civil penalty and requires Amazon to provide those records, free of charge, within 30 days of a request, subject to verification of the victims' identity and claim of identity theft.
2026
Consumers sue Amazon over seafood sustainability labels
Lawsuit filed
Consumers filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against Amazon, alleging that environmental labels on seafood sold through its platform and stores misled shoppers. The allegations have not been proven in court.
Source excerpt
Filed in federal court in Seattle, the lawsuit accuses Amazon of “greenwashing”, using environmental language or imagery to make products appear more sustainable than the available evidence supports.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of consumers including Madeleine Rogow of Los Angeles and Adam Sorkin of Chicago.
2026
San Diego man sues Amazon over tabletop fire pit burns
Lawsuit filed
A San Diego man sued Amazon and two companies involved in manufacturing a tabletop fire pit after suffering severe burns. His attorney alleges that Amazon bears some responsibility because its website made the product available to consumers and Amazon processed the transaction and profited from it.
Company response
Clarification — Amazon
Amazon responded to NBC San Diego's request for an interview with a statement saying the products had been recalled and were no longer available on its website.
Source excerpt
A San Diego man who served as a U.S. Navy helicopter search-and-rescue swimmer is suing Amazon and two companies involved in the manufacture of a tabletop fire pit after he suffered catastrophic third-degree burns to his face, neck and upper body.
Amazon responded to NBC San Diego's request for an interview with a statement saying the products had been recalled and were no longer available on its website.
The lawsuit names Amazon and two companies involved in the manufacture of the tabletop mini fire pits. Robinson alleges Amazon bears some responsibility because its website made the product publicly available to consumers, while the company processed the transaction and profited from it.
2026
Senate report criticizes data-center operators’ grid-cost positions
Issue disclosure
A report by Democratic U.S. senators stated that companies accepted paying for infrastructure dedicated to their data-center sites but opposed requirements to cover the full cost of wider grid improvements tied to their facilities. The report did not specify which companies took each position. The source article does not identify the companies involved or provide further details on the positions described.
A report by Democratic U.S. senators said companies accepted paying for infrastructure dedicated to their data-center sites but opposed requirements to cover the full cost of wider grid improvements tied to their facilities. The article does not specify which companies took each position.
Source excerpt
A report released Oct. 9 after a nearly yearlong inquiry by Democratic U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Chris Van Hollen and Richard Blumenthal said companies accepted paying for infrastructure dedicated to their sites but opposed requirements to cover the full cost of wider grid improvements tied to their facilities.
2026
Local opposition to data center development
Public backlash
In 2026, voters in multiple US jurisdictions were set to consider measures that would restrict data center development. In Sunbury, Ohio, a proposed measure could derail Amazon's proposed data center development. The event was reported as part of a broader backlash against the AI data center boom at the US ballot box.
Voters in multiple US jurisdictions are set to consider measures that would restrict data center development. In Sunbury, Ohio, a proposed measure could derail Amazon’s proposed data center development.
Source excerpt
Voters in 38 local jurisdictions will consider at least 41 measures that would delay, prohibit or impose new requirements on data centers, the sprawling facilities that provide the computing power required to run AI applications.
Baker, who is part of the advocacy group Conserve Ohio, said concerns about data centers’ electricity and water demands are driving the opposition.
In Sunbury, near Columbus, a measure that would ban data centers that use more than 25 megawatts of power could derail Amazon’s proposed $2 billion data center development.
2026
Amazon blocks Meta's Muse from accessing Amazon shopping
Issue disclosure
GeekWire reported on September 20 that users attempting to connect Meta's Muse to Amazon shopping began seeing notices stating that continued access by unauthorized AI agents violates the platform's terms of service. Amazon confirmed it had blocked Muse and said it had earlier asked Meta to exclude the shopping site from the service. Amazon also objected to agents not identifying themselves and to the handling of account credentials. Meta's published design states that credentials enter secure storage that Muse itself cannot see.
GeekWire reported on September 20 that users trying to connect Meta's Muse to Amazon shopping began seeing notices that continued access by unauthorized AI agents violates the platform's terms of service. Amazon confirmed it had blocked Muse and said it had earlier asked Meta to exclude the shopping site from the service; Amazon also objected to agents not identifying themselves and to the handling of account credentials, while Meta's published design states that credentials enter secure storage that Muse itself cannot see.
Company response
Clarification — Meta
Meta 公布的设计则称,凭证进入安全存储,Muse 本身看不到密码,安全存储并不能直接回答服务方是否同意代理访问。
Source excerpt
亚马逊对 Agent 没有表明身份以及账户凭证的处理提出异议。Meta 公布的设计则称,凭证进入安全存储,Muse 本身看不到密码,安全存储并不能直接回答服务方是否同意代理访问。
9 月 20 日,GeekWire 报道,尝试让 Muse 接入亚马逊购物的人开始看到提示:未经授权的 AI Agent 继续访问,违反平台使用条款。亚马逊确认已经阻止 Muse,并称此前曾要求 Meta 主动把购物网站排除在服务之外。
2025
Prime enrollment and cancellation settlement
The FTC announced a $2.5 billion settlement resolving allegations that Amazon enrolled consumers in Prime without adequate consent and made cancellation difficult. The allegations were resolved through a court-entered settlement rather than a trial judgment on every disputed claim.
2025
Amazon challenges CPSC recall order
Amazon sued the CPSC over an order involving more than 400,000 products sold by third-party vendors through Fulfilled by Amazon. The dispute concerned whether Amazon was legally a distributor responsible for recalls.
2024
Warehouse ergonomic and safety scrutiny
OSHA and the Department of Labor pursued enforcement concerning ergonomic hazards and musculoskeletal injury risks at Amazon facilities. A corporate-wide settlement required additional ergonomic measures.
2023
FTC antitrust lawsuit
The FTC and 17 state attorneys general alleged that Amazon used anti-discounting measures, fulfillment requirements, search and advertising practices, and seller fees to maintain monopoly power in online retail and marketplace services.
2022
D.C. court dismisses antitrust lawsuit against Amazon
Ruling
A D.C. Superior Court judge dismissed the District of Columbia's lawsuit against Amazon on the basis of Amazon's motion. The D.C. Attorney General's office said it was considering an appeal.
Source excerpt
Hiram Puig-Lugo, the D.C Superior Court Judge, tossed out the lawsuit by docket entry on the basis of Amazon's motion.
The District stated that Amazon has made online shopping more expensive rather than cheaper for consumers. Its policies do not let its sellers sell at lower prices elsewhere.
2022
Report reveals obstacles in Amazon Prime cancellation process
Issue disclosure
A report citing leaked internal documents said Amazon implemented Project Iliad to make it harder for users to cancel Prime memberships. Amazon’s spokesperson said Prime registration and cancellation were simple and transparent.
Stated objective. Reduce Prime membership churn
Company response
Clarification — Amazon
亚马逊发言人在一封电子邮件中表示,Prime的注册和取消“简洁、透明,清晰地向用户提供了选项以及选项的意义”。
Source excerpt
泄露的内部文档显示,亚马逊实施被称作“Iliad”的项目,为用户取消Prime会员设置障碍。
亚马逊发言人在一封电子邮件中表示,Prime的注册和取消“简洁、透明,清晰地向用户提供了选项以及选项的意义”。
一份文档显示,由于只有较少的用户能“走完”取消流程,2017年取消Prime会员的用户减少14%。