Controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile25 entries · Page 1 of 2
2026
Nike CEO reportedly admits company went 'too woke' as stock hits 12-year low
Company response
Fox News reported that Nike's CEO may have acknowledged that the company went 'too woke'. According to the report, the remarks came as Nike's stock hit a 12-year low. The report did not specify the exact wording of the CEO's statement or provide further details about the context in which it was made. Nike has not publicly confirmed or denied the report. The event was covered by Fox News and circulated via Google News.
Company response
Clarification — Nike
Nike CEO may have just admitted the company went too woke
Source excerpt
Nike CEO may have just admitted the company went too woke as stock hits 12-year low Fox News
2026
Business owner pays fine over suspected counterfeit branded goods
Fine or penalty
Sneaker Freakz owner Nathaniel Petersen paid a R100,000 admission-of-guilt fine following a Hawks investigation into the alleged sale of counterfeit Adidas and Nike sneakers and Lacoste T-shirts. The merchandise was suspected of being counterfeit; the article does not report a determination that the brands themselves committed wrongdoing.
Source excerpt
Nathaniel Petersen, 40, paid the admission-of-guilt fine on October 23 following a Hawks investigation into the alleged sale of fake Adidas and Nike sneakers and Lacoste T-shirts at his business, Sneaker Freakz.
2022
Nike sues StockX over sneaker NFTs
Lawsuit filed
Nike filed a lawsuit against StockX in a New York federal court, alleging that StockX's NFTs depicting Nike shoes infringed its trademarks and were likely to confuse consumers. The dispute concerns the use of Nike-branded imagery in non-fungible tokens offered by StockX. Nike's claims center on trademark infringement and the likelihood of consumer confusion arising from the NFTs. The case was brought in February 2022.
Nike sued StockX in New York federal court, alleging that StockX's NFTs depicting Nike shoes infringed its trademarks and were likely to confuse consumers.
Source excerpt
Nike has sued online reselling storefront StockX for listing non-fungible tokens (NFTs) of Nike-branded shoes without its permission.
Nike is seeking damages and a court injunction to force StockX to stop the sales.
Athletics giant Nike filed a lawsuit in New York on Thursday against shopping platform StockX for creating and marketing NFTs - the tamper-proof digital property certificates - based on the brand's products without permission.
2022
Nike sues Lululemon over Mirror device and apps
Lawsuit filed
Nike filed a lawsuit accusing Lululemon of patent infringement involving its at-home Mirror fitness device and related mobile applications. The report describes this as Nike's accusation, not a court determination.
Company response
Denial — Lululemon
A spokesperson for Lululemon said in an emailed statement, "The patents in question are overly broad and invalid. We are confident in our position and look forward to defending it in court."
Source excerpt
Nike on Wednesday filed a lawsuit accusing Lululemon of patent infringement over the apparel maker's at-home Mirror fitness device and related mobile applications.
A spokesperson for Lululemon said in an emailed statement, "The patents in question are overly broad and invalid. We are confident in our position and look forward to defending it in court."
Lululemon said in a statement: 'The patents in question are overly broad and invalid. We are confident in our position and look forward to defending it in court.'
2021
Nike sues websites over alleged counterfeit sales
Lawsuit filed
In January 2021, Nike filed a lawsuit against 589 websites that it alleged were selling counterfeit Nike and Converse shoes online. The complaint also named the owners of 676 social media accounts and more than 100 unidentified companies and individuals, all accused of alleged counterfeit activity. The filing set out Nike's allegations regarding the sale of counterfeit goods through these websites and accounts; no further details on the defendants, the amounts involved, or the outcome of the case were provided in the source.
Nike filed a lawsuit against 589 websites it alleged were selling counterfeit Nike and Converse shoes online; the complaint also named owners of 676 social media accounts and more than 100 unidentified companies and individuals for alleged counterfeit activity.
Source excerpt
Nike filed a lawsuit against 589 websites allegedly selling counterfeit versions of its Nike and Converse shoes online.
In a 130-page suit filed yesterday in New York District Court, Nike also charged the owners of 676 social media accounts and more than 100 unidentified companies and individuals for alleged counterfeit activity.
当地时间2021年1月12日,耐克和匡威在向美国纽约南区联邦地区法院递交的诉讼中写道,589个网站、676个社交媒体账号及100余个姓名不明的公司和个人涉嫌利用耐克及匡威商标的知名度,通过制造和销售假冒产品牟利。
2021
La La Land files amended counterclaim against Nike
Lawsuit filed
La La Land Production & Design Inc. filed an amended counterclaim against Nike. In the filing, La La Land accused Nike of using aggressive litigation strategies to enforce what La La Land described as questionable trade dress rights. The counterclaim characterizes Nike's enforcement efforts as aggressive and questions the validity of the trade dress rights asserted. No further details on the specific claims, parties, or outcomes are provided in the source material.
Source excerpt
It accuses the company of using “unduly aggressive, disproportionate, highly burdensome litigation strategies” to enforce “questionable” trade dress rights.
La La Land has already responded to Nike’s latest move, having filed an amended counterclaim against the sportswear giant.
According to Law360, an amended complaint filed by Nike Thursday added John Geiger Collection LLC as a defendant to an existing lawsuit against Los Angeles-based La La Land Production & Design Inc.
2021
Nike postpones Air Max 1 x Cactus Jack release after Astroworld tragedy
Company response
Nike announced that it was postponing the release of the Air Max 1 x Cactus Jack sneakers out of respect for those affected by the Astroworld Festival tragedy. The shoes had been planned for release in December. Nike announced an indefinite delay on its SNKRS app.
Nike announced that it was postponing the Air Max 1 x Cactus Jack release out of respect for those affected by the Astroworld Festival tragedy. The sneakers had been planned for release in December, and Nike announced an indefinite delay on its SNKRS app.
Source excerpt
这两家公司原计划在12月推出巴洛克棕色和土星金色的Nike x Travis Scott Air Max 1运动鞋,但耐克在其Snkrs应用程序上宣布无限期推迟。
出于对受Astroworld Festival悲剧事件影响的所有人的尊重,我们推迟了Air Max 1 x Cactus Jack的发布。
2021
Nike sues adidas over Primeknit technology
Lawsuit filed
Nike's lawsuit alleges that adidas's Primeknit technology infringes six Nike patents and identifies 49 adidas shoe models using the technology.
Source excerpt
根据耐克在12月8日递交的诉状,阿迪达斯有49款鞋使用PrimeKnit技术,该技术侵犯了耐克的六项专利。
2021
Mary Cain files abuse lawsuit against Nike and Alberto Salazar
Lawsuit filed
Mary Cain filed a $20 million lawsuit against Nike and Alberto Salazar alleging physical and mental abuse during her time with the Nike Oregon Project. The article reports allegations, not a court finding.
Company response
Clarification — Nike
Nike told KGW it doesn't comment on active litigation.
Source excerpt
The $20 million lawsuit alleges Cain suffered physical and mental abuse during her time with the Nike Oregon Project.
Former professional distance runner Mary Cain is suing her former coach, Alberto Salazar, and her former sponsor, Nike.
By Chris HatlerPublished: Oct 12, 2021 11:05 AM EDT
2021
Nike settles lawsuit over Satan Shoes
Settlement
Nike settled its lawsuit with MSCHF over the Satan Shoes. The agreement states that MSCHF will recall all the shoes and remove them from circulation.
Company response
Recall — MSCHF
Source excerpt
Nike settled their lawsuit, ensuring the shoes will not make their way onto anyone's feet. They reached an agreement with MSCHF, the company that developed the shoes.
2021
MSCHF agrees to recall Satan Shoes and Jesus Shoes
Recall announced
As part of its settlement with Nike, MSCHF agreed to a voluntary recall of the Satan Shoes and also said it would recall the earlier Jesus Shoes. Customers who return the recalled shoes can receive refunds.
Stated objective. to remove them from circulation
Company response
Recall — MSCHF Product Studio Inc.
The shoe giant said that MSCHF had agreed to a voluntary recall on the sneakers, which were designed with input from the 21-year-old rapper.
Refund or compensation — MSCHF Product Studio Inc.
The custom company produced 666 pairs of the shoes but will now have to refund any customers who opt to return them as part of the recall.
Source excerpt
As part of the settlement, MSCHF will also recall those earlier sneakers and offer full refunds 'to remove them from circulation.
The shoe giant said that MSCHF had agreed to a voluntary recall on the sneakers, which were designed with input from the 21-year-old rapper.
"MSCHF has agreed to initiate a voluntary recall to buy back any Satan Shoes and Jesus Shoes for their original retail prices, to remove them from circulation," Nike said in a statement.
2021
H&M pledges to regain trust in China amid boycott
Company response
H&M said it would work to regain the trust and confidence of its customers and business partners in China amid a boycott targeting the retailer and other Western companies. The company also said it was developing forward-looking strategies concerning material sourcing.
Company response
Ongoing disclosure — H&M
We want to be a responsible buyer, in China and elsewhere, and are now building forward-looking strategies and actively working on next steps with regards to material sourcing.
Source excerpt
Earlier this month, users of the Chinese platform Weibo called for a boycott of H&M after finding a year-old statement on its website saying it stopped sourcing cotton from Xinjiang over the alleged use of forced labour and discrimination against ethno-religious minorities there.
highlighted the importance of the Chinese market in the wake of a boycott that targeted H&M, Nike, and several other western companies in China.
statement on Wednesday that the company is going to regain the trust and confidence of its customers and business partners in China.
2021
Nike sues MSCHF over Satan Shoes
Lawsuit filed
Nike sued MSCHF over the Satan Shoes. Nike claims MSCHF tricked consumers into thinking Nike approved the shoes and alleges trademark infringement because the Nike Swoosh remains prominently featured. These are claims reported by the source, not a court determination.
Source excerpt
The shoe company says MSCHF infringed on its trademarks by selling limited-edition custom Nikes that were allegedly modified with a drop of human blood.
Nike has sued internet collective MSCHF for selling “unauthorized Satan Shoes” in collaboration with rapper Lil Nas X.
In a statement after the complaint was filed, Nike reiterated that it is in no way affiliated with the Satan Shoes.
2021
Calls in China to end Nike sponsorships
Public backlash
The article reported calls in China to end sponsorship agreements with Nike over its cotton-sourcing position. It also said a Soccer News post reported that the Chinese Football Association and a professional league preparatory group had condemned Nike and reserved the right to take further action under their contract; the post was deleted shortly after publication.
Source excerpt
不過,上述報導發出不久就悄悄撤稿。中國足協又恢復了沉默。
但面對小粉紅們強烈要求與耐克解約的呼聲,中國體壇一直未有回應。
27日早,《足球報》官方微博一度發文稱,中國足協和職業聯盟籌備組召開了「緊急內部會議」,對耐克在棉花原料選擇上的「錯誤行徑」表達了「譴責」,並稱「將保留」進一步處理與耐克合約的權力。
2021
Consumer boycott of Western brands in China
Public backlash
Consumers in mainland China boycotted H&M, Nike, Burberry and other Western brands amid a social-media campaign targeting companies that had refused to use cotton from Xinjiang over alleged forced labor.
Source excerpt
这项运动旨在针对那些拒绝使用涉嫌强迫劳动的新疆棉花的美国和其它国际公司。
H&M、耐克、巴宝莉等西方跨国公司在中国大陆遭到消费者抵制。
2021
H&M and Nike face criticism in China over Xinjiang statements
Public backlash
H&M faced a potential boycott in China after a social media storm over its earlier statement expressing concern about reports of forced labor in Xinjiang. The article also reported that a similar statement from Nike was attracting criticism.
Source excerpt
Fashion retailer H&M is facing a potential boycott in China after a statement the company made last year expressing deep concerns over reports of forced labor in Xinjiang stirred a social media storm this week.
A similar statement from Nike was also attracting criticism on Wednesday, a sign that Western clothing manufacturers could face growing hostility in China for their public stances against forced labor in Xinjiang and for halting cotton sourcing from the region.
Today, celebrities, tech brands and state media, aided by outrage on China's tightly-controlled social media, piled in on several global fashion brands, as China's vast consumer market was mobilised.
2021
French Uyghur group sues Nike over alleged forced labour complicity
Lawsuit filed
The Association of Uighurs in France filed a lawsuit against Nike, accusing it of deceptive business practices and complicity in concealing forced labour. Nike denied the allegations.
Company response
Denial — Nike
Nike has denied the allegations.
Source excerpt
Nike has denied the allegations.
2020
Vaporfly competition-fairness controversy
Nike's Vaporfly racing shoes were criticized for potentially providing a substantial mechanical advantage through their foam, plate and sole design. The debate contributed to World Athletics rules addressing commercially available racing shoes, sole thickness and construction.
2020
Game Plan sues over slogan
Lawsuit filed
Game Plan Inc filed a lawsuit against Uninterrupted, Nike, Disney, and Two-Take Interactive Software Inc., claiming that LeBron James and Uninterrupted took its "I am more than an athlete" slogan. Uninterrupted called the lawsuit "meritless."
Company response
Denial — Uninterrupted
Uninterrupted has slammed the lawsuit as 'meritless'.
Source excerpt
Maryland non-profit Game Plan Inc filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against LeBron James' Uninterrupted media company. They claim James stole their 'I am more than an athlete' slogan. They also sued Nike Disney, and Two-Take Interactive Software Inc.
Uninterrupted has slammed the lawsuit as 'meritless'.
2020
Judge rules Nike owns the Klaw logo
Ruling
In the dispute over the Klaw logo, U.S. District Judge Michael W. Mosman ruled in favor of Nike. The court found that the logo, which Nike created with assistance from Kawhi Leonard, constituted an independent piece of intellectual property and that Leonard did not own it. The ruling addressed ownership of the logo itself rather than any broader claims between the parties.
U.S. District Judge Michael W. Mosman ruled in Nike's favor in the dispute over the Klaw logo, finding that the logo Nike created with Kawhi Leonard's help was an independent piece of intellectual property and that Leonard did not own it.
Source excerpt
U.S. District Judge Michael W. Mosman decided that the “Klaw” logo created by Nike with Leonard’s help was an “independent piece of intellectual property," meaning Leonard doesn't own it.
According to TMZ Sports, on Wednesday the presiding judge ruled in favor of the footwear giant in the dispute over who has the rights to the logo.